Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
BOEF no longer D20! Now it's OGL!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 1138165" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>I'm going to approach this in reverse order...</p><p></p><p>I don't think you're wrong about how the changes work. If the BoEF had come out before the changes, it seems that WotC could have ordered a destruction of the product.</p><p></p><p>So, would beating the deadline have served any purpose for Valar? Perhaps. The stuff I've seen coming from AV about this suggest that economic welfare of Valar was secondary to the strategic and moral/ethical purposes.</p><p></p><p>Folks around here like to paint a picture of WotC as evil. However, it seems to me that the evidence shows them having a pretty darned good record of working with third party publisers in general, and their former employees especially. </p><p></p><p>So, given that history of playing nice, we must ask - if AV had gotten the BoEF out before the license change, would WotC have put out the changes and then ordered the product's destruction, knowing that Valar is small and new and would take a big hit from the loss? Maybe, and maybe not. </p><p></p><p>Fan PR isn't really a big deal, as only a few of the millions of gamers out there would hear about this. But they'd be taking action against a former employee. Retroactive action, which is kind of petty. That can't feel really great to them personally, and it would harm their ability to deal with other third-party people in the future (because they'd forevermore be worried about license issues), which doesn't seem to be in WotC's interest.</p><p></p><p>So, AV dislikes the changes with a passion. He tries and fails to stop them fro the inside, and finally decides to try to say, "Fine, if you want to implement these changes, you'll have to go through me to do it." </p><p></p><p>If he had managed to get the book out early, he couldn't lose the whole deal. If WotC backs down, he wins on all fronts. He keeps the d20 logo on his product, and effectively weakens WotC's clout concerning enforcing that part of the license. If WotC doesn't back down, AV takes an economic hit, but WotC loses face as a company that plays nice with others. That scores at least a moral victory for AV.</p><p></p><p>This all doesn't work if he doesn't get the book out early enough. If the license changes come out first, then WotC is on the moral high-ground of having the policy there in plain view before the BoEF's release.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 1138165, member: 177"] I'm going to approach this in reverse order... I don't think you're wrong about how the changes work. If the BoEF had come out before the changes, it seems that WotC could have ordered a destruction of the product. So, would beating the deadline have served any purpose for Valar? Perhaps. The stuff I've seen coming from AV about this suggest that economic welfare of Valar was secondary to the strategic and moral/ethical purposes. Folks around here like to paint a picture of WotC as evil. However, it seems to me that the evidence shows them having a pretty darned good record of working with third party publisers in general, and their former employees especially. So, given that history of playing nice, we must ask - if AV had gotten the BoEF out before the license change, would WotC have put out the changes and then ordered the product's destruction, knowing that Valar is small and new and would take a big hit from the loss? Maybe, and maybe not. Fan PR isn't really a big deal, as only a few of the millions of gamers out there would hear about this. But they'd be taking action against a former employee. Retroactive action, which is kind of petty. That can't feel really great to them personally, and it would harm their ability to deal with other third-party people in the future (because they'd forevermore be worried about license issues), which doesn't seem to be in WotC's interest. So, AV dislikes the changes with a passion. He tries and fails to stop them fro the inside, and finally decides to try to say, "Fine, if you want to implement these changes, you'll have to go through me to do it." If he had managed to get the book out early, he couldn't lose the whole deal. If WotC backs down, he wins on all fronts. He keeps the d20 logo on his product, and effectively weakens WotC's clout concerning enforcing that part of the license. If WotC doesn't back down, AV takes an economic hit, but WotC loses face as a company that plays nice with others. That scores at least a moral victory for AV. This all doesn't work if he doesn't get the book out early enough. If the license changes come out first, then WotC is on the moral high-ground of having the policy there in plain view before the BoEF's release. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
BOEF no longer D20! Now it's OGL!
Top