Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Thanatos" data-source="post: 3046785" data-attributes="member: 5261">Sure, they can take fighter feats -- but thats not to completely serve them as well as taking feats designed for martial adept classes in a number of examples, especially with regards to prereq's for tactical feats. They get alot fewer feats then fighters do overall and really have more to spend them on.You're twisting my words, I enver said anyone was &quot;shorted&quot; on sustained damage, but the potential for the martial adept classes and burst damage is better then your averagely designed fighter (probably not your optimally designed fighter, but I don't know for certain; but I've never really seen 'burst' style damage fighters). At least thats my opinion, based on what I have read and seen examples of so far. Never did I say anything of the sort...I was pointing out why they are often not taken out first as a standard tactic like arcane casters and healers.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Thanatos, post: 3046785, member: 5261"] Sure, they can take fighter feats -- but thats not to completely serve them as well as taking feats designed for martial adept classes in a number of examples, especially with regards to prereq's for tactical feats. They get alot fewer feats then fighters do overall and really have more to spend them on. You're twisting my words, I enver said anyone was "shorted" on sustained damage, but the potential for the martial adept classes and burst damage is better then your averagely designed fighter (probably not your optimally designed fighter, but I don't know for certain; but I've never really seen 'burst' style damage fighters). At least thats my opinion, based on what I have read and seen examples of so far. Never did I say anything of the sort...I was pointing out why they are often not taken out first as a standard tactic like arcane casters and healers. [/QUOTE]

Verification