Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Book of Nine Swords -- okay?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Leugren" data-source="post: 3059860" data-attributes="member: 44754"><p>Sorry to disagree, TG, but your thread doesn't really prove that much about the efficacy of the Power Attack feat. If it proves anything at all, it proves that uber-charger builds can more than hold their own against most martial adept builds. The problem with this line of reasoning is that you're comparing extremes rather than norms. Unless you believe that uber-chargers represent the norm as far as melee builds go, then your examples obscure the fact that, without AoO specialization or charge/pounce cheese, the damage potential for the average melee combat specialist really blows compared to his/her average ToB counterpart. You're also playing right into the claims of the naysayers on this thread who argue that the pro-ToB group on this thread is divided into two contradictory camps:</p><p></p><p>CAMP #1: "Warriors were underpowered. ToB gave them a much-needed boost."</p><p></p><p>CAMP #2: "Warriors have always been more powerful. ToB didn't actually increase the power level."</p><p></p><p>Both camps can't be correct! With the arguments you put forth, you seem to be arguing for the beliefs of camp #2, but I <em>know</em> you believe melee combat specialists have always been underpowered relative to most of the spellcasting classes at higher levels.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is really the argument that we should be driving home against these guys.</p><p></p><p>I therefore still contend that a typical sword and board melee build absolutely <em>blows</em> compared to a typical spellcaster build beyond around 8th level. If we are going to discuss issues of balance between the classes, then we need to examine a full spectrum of builds which, taken collectively, comprise a bell-shaped normal distribution in terms of efficacy and damage potential. I hold that the median of this normal distribution for fighters really blows compared to the median for spellcasters. Uber-chargers and AoO specialists are not the median but rather the extremes, and comparing extremes is unreliable in statistical analysis. The ToB gives a much-needed boost <em>to the median</em> for melee combat specialists relative to the median for spellcasters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Leugren, post: 3059860, member: 44754"] Sorry to disagree, TG, but your thread doesn't really prove that much about the efficacy of the Power Attack feat. If it proves anything at all, it proves that uber-charger builds can more than hold their own against most martial adept builds. The problem with this line of reasoning is that you're comparing extremes rather than norms. Unless you believe that uber-chargers represent the norm as far as melee builds go, then your examples obscure the fact that, without AoO specialization or charge/pounce cheese, the damage potential for the average melee combat specialist really blows compared to his/her average ToB counterpart. You're also playing right into the claims of the naysayers on this thread who argue that the pro-ToB group on this thread is divided into two contradictory camps: CAMP #1: "Warriors were underpowered. ToB gave them a much-needed boost." CAMP #2: "Warriors have always been more powerful. ToB didn't actually increase the power level." Both camps can't be correct! With the arguments you put forth, you seem to be arguing for the beliefs of camp #2, but I [I]know[/I] you believe melee combat specialists have always been underpowered relative to most of the spellcasting classes at higher levels. This is really the argument that we should be driving home against these guys. I therefore still contend that a typical sword and board melee build absolutely [I]blows[/I] compared to a typical spellcaster build beyond around 8th level. If we are going to discuss issues of balance between the classes, then we need to examine a full spectrum of builds which, taken collectively, comprise a bell-shaped normal distribution in terms of efficacy and damage potential. I hold that the median of this normal distribution for fighters really blows compared to the median for spellcasters. Uber-chargers and AoO specialists are not the median but rather the extremes, and comparing extremes is unreliable in statistical analysis. The ToB gives a much-needed boost [I]to the median[/I] for melee combat specialists relative to the median for spellcasters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Book of Nine Swords -- okay?
Top