Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mercutio01" data-source="post: 5751728" data-attributes="member: 37277">I've never GMed an evil campaign, but I did play in one that started at the neutral end of good and progressed to the neutral end of evil.Something like below.Good . . . . . X . . Neutral . . Y . . . . EvilIt was driven by player actions in the game world and explored characters shifting in moral grey areas until their end goals, justified or desirable as they may have been, were being sought after using increasingly more evil actions. That was, without a doubt, one of the most entertaining campaigns I've ever played.I think moral dilemmas are excellent fodder for games with mature (in the intellectual sense) gamers who can explore them without falling into chaotic stupid. But I also think that in games with rigid alignment systems, there are some pitfalls if using the rules as written, especially with game mechanics that rely on those rigid alignments.</blockquote>