Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 8741408" data-attributes="member: 7006">I mean, I'm with you 100%.  But I also cannot deny that there are players here on the boards that really seem to notice even the slightest differentials in game balance based upon how they play their games.Heh heh... the one thing I'm curious about is what some responses are going to be from some players when the revised Classes and Sub-classes UA packets come out.  Because we've seen over the entire lifespan of 5E that things like the Beastmaster, 4 Elements Monk, Wild Sorcerer etc. are considered "absolute trash" and that no one in their right mind should ever allow these anathemas to good taste appear in their games... but yet if/when we see Revised versions of them, will we also get complaints that the 2014 books are even more "incompatible" because of the power differential between the 2024 and 2014 versions, and that WotC "lied to us!" about backwards compatibility?Call my cynical... but I have no doubt that we'll probably see at least one complaint of that type.  Some people wanted the 4 Elements Monk fixed, but now that it's done so, the old one is now even more worthless and no one can use it at all anymore and all that talk about backwards compatibility was just hot air.  WotC won't be able to win either way.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

Verification