Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Booming Blade seems a bit powerful
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 7169017" data-attributes="member: 16814"><p>I think you're taking the combining magical effects too far. It clearly does not say that the two spells do not act upon the target. In fact, it says the opposite in the first paragraph, when talking about two different spells, so we understand that a target with two spells will, <strong>in general</strong>, have both spells act upon it. Again, the general rule is that all spells cast on a target act upon the target normally. So, then the section talks about what happens if more than one of the same spell is cast on a target. Here it doesn't say anything about those spells not acting upon the target, it in fact only says that only the results of the most potent are applied to the target. Again, as per the general rule, both spells act upon on the target, but according to the specific rule, only the results of the most potent are applied. Nothing is said that modifies, in any way, any other functioning of the spell, so the general rules adhere. In the case of booming blade, all instances trigger, discharge, and end at the same time, but only one, the most potent, has it's effects applied to the target.</p><p></p><p>The only ruling available here is what potent means. DMs may differ, but if you follow the general<specific rule and look only at the specific change called out - only one effect applied - then this pretty quickly and efficiently solves itself. Now, if you want to work on how potent should be read, you'll have to excuse me I have a dental appointment I'd rather be at.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 7169017, member: 16814"] I think you're taking the combining magical effects too far. It clearly does not say that the two spells do not act upon the target. In fact, it says the opposite in the first paragraph, when talking about two different spells, so we understand that a target with two spells will, [B]in general[/B], have both spells act upon it. Again, the general rule is that all spells cast on a target act upon the target normally. So, then the section talks about what happens if more than one of the same spell is cast on a target. Here it doesn't say anything about those spells not acting upon the target, it in fact only says that only the results of the most potent are applied to the target. Again, as per the general rule, both spells act upon on the target, but according to the specific rule, only the results of the most potent are applied. Nothing is said that modifies, in any way, any other functioning of the spell, so the general rules adhere. In the case of booming blade, all instances trigger, discharge, and end at the same time, but only one, the most potent, has it's effects applied to the target. The only ruling available here is what potent means. DMs may differ, but if you follow the general<specific rule and look only at the specific change called out - only one effect applied - then this pretty quickly and efficiently solves itself. Now, if you want to work on how potent should be read, you'll have to excuse me I have a dental appointment I'd rather be at. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Booming Blade seems a bit powerful
Top