Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Boost Combat Expertise with Shields
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elder-Basilisk" data-source="post: 2731631" data-attributes="member: 3146"><p>Let's revisit this analysis again because there are a few important things to consider:</p><p></p><p>1. This analysis is located at level 5--the most favorable point possible for the shield and combat expertise wielder. Locate the analysis at level 12, for instance, and the character will have a lot more trouble being unhittable. A 12th level fighter (since you are objecting to orcs, how about a standard array human fighter) might expect to have an 18 strength (20 with gauntlets of ogre power), a +1 sword, and greater weapon focus. So, he starts off at +20 to hit without any buffs (which he will most likely have--NPCs are only worth their CR if they are working together in a party that supports each other). In order to get an AC of 40, even with this rule, the character needs either a +3 tower shield and +3 fullplate or +4 heavy shield and +4 fullplate or some combination a ring of protection and an amulet of natural armor. </p><p></p><p>Of course, a 12th level fighter IS going to have those alternate tactics like disarming, sundering or grappling, so even then, it's not the best comparison. A cloud giant (CR 11) has an attack bonus of +22 (and Improved Bull Rush and Improved Overrun to put the fighter on his back or push him off a cliff). A CR 13 storm giant has +26 to hit (and Improved Sunder and Improved Bull Rush) as well as some nifty spell like abilities. A CR 12 displacer beast pack lord is +25 to hit with its tentacles. A CR 11 Dire wereboar hill giant is +29 to hit with his greatclub (and has Improved Bull Rush and Improved Sunder). A dire tiger is +20 to hit at only CR 8. A mature adult white dragon is also CR 12 and attacks at +27.</p><p></p><p>Did I cherry pick the monsters with good attack bonuses. Sure. But most of the other monsters have something else to do. A CR 11 Hezrou, for instance, couldn't hit the fighter but he doesn't need to. He has Chaos Hammer and Unholy Blight at will (along with a 3/day blasphemy that, if he has any allies, can be relied upon to destroy any 11th or 12th level party, but using blasphemy like that is cheating). A twelve headed hydra is CR 11 and only +17. But it has fast healing 22 and 12 attacks per round. So, the unhittable fighter can expect to get hit every couple rounds and, unless he hits two or three times per round himself, isn't going to inflict any lasting harm on the hydra. (A CR 12 eleven headed pyro or cryo hydra will just breathe on the fighter and toast him). Similarly, a Kolyarut is CR 12 but has enervation and vampiric touch at will and hold monster 1/day. A dread wraith is also in that CR range but makes incorporeal touch attacks. The point is that, by CR 12, any monster who is just a beatstick is going to have a higher attack bonus than the 12th level fighter can expect to get AND may have good options in addition to that. (Note that pretty much all the giants and the wereboar have Improved Sunder and the dragon has its (unimpressive--it's a white dragon) breath weapon).</p><p></p><p>The analysis has demonstrated that it can fairly easily render a character unhittable at level 5 (if he sacrifices most of his offense for it) but that doesn't last to the higher levels.</p><p></p><p>2. The character is only just barely unhittable with the magic items AND the tower shield AND 2 for 1 Combat Expertise while fighting defensively. The orc is +16 to attack. The other character is: AC 38 (10+9 armor +5 shield, +1 dex, +10 Combat Expertise, +2 fighting defensively). Without the tower shield, he's down to AC 36 maximum, and without the magic items or the tower shield (which you suggest is unhittable) he's down to AC 34 maximum which is hittable on an 18. And that's still fighting defensively along with the full combat expertise.</p><p></p><p>3. While the orc does represent the high attack point for a CR 5 NPC's, he does not represent the high point for creatures that a level 5 fighter can expect to face in combat (though I'll admit he is pretty close absent advanced or class leveled monsters, his attack bonus is better than any CR 5 in the Monster Manual). Fighter 5s have to be prepared to face a variety of creatures with CRs as high as 7 or 8. Dire bears anyone?</p><p></p><p>4. You are all vastly underestimating the importance of having an actual offense. The defensively oriented fighter has to be able to mount an effective offense if his defensive prowess is not simply to mean that he is the last PC to be killed. The usual tactic for monsters (or for PCs) when faced with an unhittable opponent who does not present a significant offensive threat (and when he's taking -8 or -10 to hit, the fighter won't qualify as a signficant offensive threat) is, absent any special manuevers (grapple, disarm, sunder, etc) to simply ignore him and go after the characters who are a threat. So the fighter doesn't take any damage. That does nothing to help the wizard, rogue or cleric, when the orc barbarian decides to take out his frustration on them. And without their support, the fighter is going to be in a world of hurt.</p><p></p><p>In the end, it may well be that the option is overpowered. But it's not as dramatically or as obviously overpowered as people seem to be suggesting. And a +2 bonus when shifting 2 points of attack to defense with Combat Expertise would probably end up fairly balanced. (As well as offering characters who don't get animated shields and two-handed weapons a benefit).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elder-Basilisk, post: 2731631, member: 3146"] Let's revisit this analysis again because there are a few important things to consider: 1. This analysis is located at level 5--the most favorable point possible for the shield and combat expertise wielder. Locate the analysis at level 12, for instance, and the character will have a lot more trouble being unhittable. A 12th level fighter (since you are objecting to orcs, how about a standard array human fighter) might expect to have an 18 strength (20 with gauntlets of ogre power), a +1 sword, and greater weapon focus. So, he starts off at +20 to hit without any buffs (which he will most likely have--NPCs are only worth their CR if they are working together in a party that supports each other). In order to get an AC of 40, even with this rule, the character needs either a +3 tower shield and +3 fullplate or +4 heavy shield and +4 fullplate or some combination a ring of protection and an amulet of natural armor. Of course, a 12th level fighter IS going to have those alternate tactics like disarming, sundering or grappling, so even then, it's not the best comparison. A cloud giant (CR 11) has an attack bonus of +22 (and Improved Bull Rush and Improved Overrun to put the fighter on his back or push him off a cliff). A CR 13 storm giant has +26 to hit (and Improved Sunder and Improved Bull Rush) as well as some nifty spell like abilities. A CR 12 displacer beast pack lord is +25 to hit with its tentacles. A CR 11 Dire wereboar hill giant is +29 to hit with his greatclub (and has Improved Bull Rush and Improved Sunder). A dire tiger is +20 to hit at only CR 8. A mature adult white dragon is also CR 12 and attacks at +27. Did I cherry pick the monsters with good attack bonuses. Sure. But most of the other monsters have something else to do. A CR 11 Hezrou, for instance, couldn't hit the fighter but he doesn't need to. He has Chaos Hammer and Unholy Blight at will (along with a 3/day blasphemy that, if he has any allies, can be relied upon to destroy any 11th or 12th level party, but using blasphemy like that is cheating). A twelve headed hydra is CR 11 and only +17. But it has fast healing 22 and 12 attacks per round. So, the unhittable fighter can expect to get hit every couple rounds and, unless he hits two or three times per round himself, isn't going to inflict any lasting harm on the hydra. (A CR 12 eleven headed pyro or cryo hydra will just breathe on the fighter and toast him). Similarly, a Kolyarut is CR 12 but has enervation and vampiric touch at will and hold monster 1/day. A dread wraith is also in that CR range but makes incorporeal touch attacks. The point is that, by CR 12, any monster who is just a beatstick is going to have a higher attack bonus than the 12th level fighter can expect to get AND may have good options in addition to that. (Note that pretty much all the giants and the wereboar have Improved Sunder and the dragon has its (unimpressive--it's a white dragon) breath weapon). The analysis has demonstrated that it can fairly easily render a character unhittable at level 5 (if he sacrifices most of his offense for it) but that doesn't last to the higher levels. 2. The character is only just barely unhittable with the magic items AND the tower shield AND 2 for 1 Combat Expertise while fighting defensively. The orc is +16 to attack. The other character is: AC 38 (10+9 armor +5 shield, +1 dex, +10 Combat Expertise, +2 fighting defensively). Without the tower shield, he's down to AC 36 maximum, and without the magic items or the tower shield (which you suggest is unhittable) he's down to AC 34 maximum which is hittable on an 18. And that's still fighting defensively along with the full combat expertise. 3. While the orc does represent the high attack point for a CR 5 NPC's, he does not represent the high point for creatures that a level 5 fighter can expect to face in combat (though I'll admit he is pretty close absent advanced or class leveled monsters, his attack bonus is better than any CR 5 in the Monster Manual). Fighter 5s have to be prepared to face a variety of creatures with CRs as high as 7 or 8. Dire bears anyone? 4. You are all vastly underestimating the importance of having an actual offense. The defensively oriented fighter has to be able to mount an effective offense if his defensive prowess is not simply to mean that he is the last PC to be killed. The usual tactic for monsters (or for PCs) when faced with an unhittable opponent who does not present a significant offensive threat (and when he's taking -8 or -10 to hit, the fighter won't qualify as a signficant offensive threat) is, absent any special manuevers (grapple, disarm, sunder, etc) to simply ignore him and go after the characters who are a threat. So the fighter doesn't take any damage. That does nothing to help the wizard, rogue or cleric, when the orc barbarian decides to take out his frustration on them. And without their support, the fighter is going to be in a world of hurt. In the end, it may well be that the option is overpowered. But it's not as dramatically or as obviously overpowered as people seem to be suggesting. And a +2 bonus when shifting 2 points of attack to defense with Combat Expertise would probably end up fairly balanced. (As well as offering characters who don't get animated shields and two-handed weapons a benefit). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Boost Combat Expertise with Shields
Top