Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="James McMurray" data-source="post: 548125" data-attributes="member: 743">I suppose then its a good thing that there's no comparison, since the poster isn't asking for one. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />For my part, I'd say go with base cost of the con bonus, plus 8,000gp. I agree that Endurance is not a very useful feat, nor is Run (usually). However, I can't see myself allowing them to be granted at 1,000gp each (total 4,000 for both as secondary properties). 2,000 for each sounds better.Also, for only 2,000gp each, you could have an entire party running around with these boots (sans CON boost) and they'd sure be travelling far each day. Not that faster overland tracel is necessarily a bad thing, but it could make it harder to run journey oriented adventures.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="James McMurray, post: 548125, member: 743"] I suppose then its a good thing that there's no comparison, since the poster isn't asking for one. :) For my part, I'd say go with base cost of the con bonus, plus 8,000gp. I agree that Endurance is not a very useful feat, nor is Run (usually). However, I can't see myself allowing them to be granted at 1,000gp each (total 4,000 for both as secondary properties). 2,000 for each sounds better. Also, for only 2,000gp each, you could have an entire party running around with these boots (sans CON boost) and they'd sure be travelling far each day. Not that faster overland tracel is necessarily a bad thing, but it could make it harder to run journey oriented adventures. [/QUOTE]

Verification