Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="loviatarfrostbringer" data-source="post: 128018" data-attributes="member: 3514">I don't really see much of a problem with either method presented, as long as something is getting doubled.However for my campaign, I calculate the total item's value with all powers added and make the spellcaster pay any difference required to enchant the new power into it.  The total item's cost is figured at [most expensive power] + [2*second power] ad infinitum .It may seem harsh and perhaps non-sensical to some but it makes for consistency and IMHO one could compare the multiple enchanting process to putting a square peg into a round hole = beat the peg enough and it will fit into the hole (i.e. paying the net difference between the old and the new item's cost).  I think I termed it to one of my players as "magical synergy" or something like that.  It also allows my players to keep the same magic items I hand out and enchant to their liking...as opposed to making magic items disposable/trade-bait.Hope it makes sense.We now return you to your regularly scheduled propaganda.</blockquote>