Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Boring Skill Mastery
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 6005509" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>I say it's highly dependent on the skill.</p><p></p><p>Take a typical Rogue-ish skill: Find and Remove Traps or Open Lock. </p><p></p><p>"Picking a typical lock" is DC20. I cannot find a DC for "disarming a typical trap", but I think it's reasonable to assume DC20 as well.</p><p></p><p>This means that a 1st-level Rogue cannot automatically pick that lock or disarm that trap because her maximum ability bonus is +5 (and will always be) and her skill bonus is +3, hence take 10 is only 18. Even such "perfect" Rogue has to wait at least until level 5 to automatically pick a "typical lock" or disarm a typical trap.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand... some skills have a penalty for failure (called "hazard"). Now <strong>that</strong> is where the take 10 features kicks in... that Rogue is not going to set off the trap and suffer the penalties thanks to her Skill Mastery. This is of course situational, clearly there are other skills such as Pick Locks where there is no hazard to avoid.</p><p></p><p>I don't know why you are worried about raising the DC if you have a Rogue in the party. I could argue that a "typical lock" is well... typical, so if you are using something worse then you are actually doing the opposite i.e. lowering the DC to let others have a better chance. It's actually ok to do either. </p><p></p><p>If you check the probabilities of success for a Rogue vs a non-Rogue, you'll notice that they are exactly the same when the DC is higher than the one corresponding to a 50% chance (i.e. the DC which requires a roll of 11). The difference is for lower DCs, when the Rogue would have at least 55% chance of success, it defaults to automatic success. </p><p></p><p>Here there is a gamestyle issue IMHO: if in your game you put easy challenges that <em>must</em> be beaten in order to proceed (e.g. the locked door that is necessary to get past in order to continue with the adventure, the collapsing bridge that must be passed lest the PCs fall to death), and expect the PCs to normally beat all of them except the occasional one, then you are right that Skill Mastery can spoil that. But if you instead put hard challenges that don't block the game but enable some extras (e.g. the locked door with a bonus treasure or a shortcut behind) then they are going to have high DCs and Skill Mastery works actually great because take 10 can't help to beat, but can still keep the Rogue safe from the hazard.</p><p></p><p>Overall as I say, it's highly dependent on the skill tho... and for instance I certainly dislike this when applied to Lore checks!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 6005509, member: 1465"] I say it's highly dependent on the skill. Take a typical Rogue-ish skill: Find and Remove Traps or Open Lock. "Picking a typical lock" is DC20. I cannot find a DC for "disarming a typical trap", but I think it's reasonable to assume DC20 as well. This means that a 1st-level Rogue cannot automatically pick that lock or disarm that trap because her maximum ability bonus is +5 (and will always be) and her skill bonus is +3, hence take 10 is only 18. Even such "perfect" Rogue has to wait at least until level 5 to automatically pick a "typical lock" or disarm a typical trap. On the other hand... some skills have a penalty for failure (called "hazard"). Now [B]that[/B] is where the take 10 features kicks in... that Rogue is not going to set off the trap and suffer the penalties thanks to her Skill Mastery. This is of course situational, clearly there are other skills such as Pick Locks where there is no hazard to avoid. I don't know why you are worried about raising the DC if you have a Rogue in the party. I could argue that a "typical lock" is well... typical, so if you are using something worse then you are actually doing the opposite i.e. lowering the DC to let others have a better chance. It's actually ok to do either. If you check the probabilities of success for a Rogue vs a non-Rogue, you'll notice that they are exactly the same when the DC is higher than the one corresponding to a 50% chance (i.e. the DC which requires a roll of 11). The difference is for lower DCs, when the Rogue would have at least 55% chance of success, it defaults to automatic success. Here there is a gamestyle issue IMHO: if in your game you put easy challenges that [I]must[/I] be beaten in order to proceed (e.g. the locked door that is necessary to get past in order to continue with the adventure, the collapsing bridge that must be passed lest the PCs fall to death), and expect the PCs to normally beat all of them except the occasional one, then you are right that Skill Mastery can spoil that. But if you instead put hard challenges that don't block the game but enable some extras (e.g. the locked door with a bonus treasure or a shortcut behind) then they are going to have high DCs and Skill Mastery works actually great because take 10 can't help to beat, but can still keep the Rogue safe from the hazard. Overall as I say, it's highly dependent on the skill tho... and for instance I certainly dislike this when applied to Lore checks! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Boring Skill Mastery
Top