Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bracers that stack?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Empirate" data-source="post: 6152204" data-attributes="member: 78958"><p>I like your retooling of the Dastana, @<em><strong><u><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?u=22424" target="_blank">delericho</a></u></strong></em> , but I think that your earlier statement that it "probably shouldn't exist" is entirely more to the point. Dastana are metal bracers. Most armor already includes some form of arm guards. So wearing metal bracers along with it shouldn't do anything. This is reflected in the Dastana rules which say it can only be worn usefully with "padded, leather, or chainshirt armor". These kinds of armor don't have arm guards, so wearing a Dastana with them is fine from a logical standpoint. What is strange is that a Breastplate is not included, and that's where we leave logic behind and go into rulespace.</p><p></p><p>The mechanical implementation ought not to be for the Dastana to provide an AC bonus on its own; or even to just increase the existing AC bonus of the armor worn beneath the Dastana. Because there already is a way in the rules for getting better AC bonus than "padded, leather, or chainshirt armor". I.e., wear the next best thing! That may bump you up to medium armor in the case of Chainshirts, but whatever, wearing more armor than a Chainshirt will obviously encumber you quite a bit! Why introduce a new mechanic into improving armor types, and a mechanic which plays havoc with the stacking rules, when there's a perfectly fine mechanic already in place?</p><p></p><p>I'd do away with the Dastana as a mechanical entity entirely, and instead merely have it as a cosmetic thing. You're wearing light armor, but one step better than leather? Call it "leather cuirass along with metal arm guards" all you like, but mechanically, it's just Studded Leather. You want better protection than with a Chain Shirt, maybe by adding something to protect your forearms? Sorry, but that's just so much metal that it bumps your armor up to medium. "Chain Shirt plus metal arm guards" may be your description, but by the rules, you're now wearing what amounts to Chainmail. You want to "go unarmored, but block the occasional blow with your metal wristguards"? Well, mechanically, you're now wearing Padded armor.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Empirate, post: 6152204, member: 78958"] I like your retooling of the Dastana, @[I][B][U][URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?u=22424"]delericho[/URL][/U][/B][/I] , but I think that your earlier statement that it "probably shouldn't exist" is entirely more to the point. Dastana are metal bracers. Most armor already includes some form of arm guards. So wearing metal bracers along with it shouldn't do anything. This is reflected in the Dastana rules which say it can only be worn usefully with "padded, leather, or chainshirt armor". These kinds of armor don't have arm guards, so wearing a Dastana with them is fine from a logical standpoint. What is strange is that a Breastplate is not included, and that's where we leave logic behind and go into rulespace. The mechanical implementation ought not to be for the Dastana to provide an AC bonus on its own; or even to just increase the existing AC bonus of the armor worn beneath the Dastana. Because there already is a way in the rules for getting better AC bonus than "padded, leather, or chainshirt armor". I.e., wear the next best thing! That may bump you up to medium armor in the case of Chainshirts, but whatever, wearing more armor than a Chainshirt will obviously encumber you quite a bit! Why introduce a new mechanic into improving armor types, and a mechanic which plays havoc with the stacking rules, when there's a perfectly fine mechanic already in place? I'd do away with the Dastana as a mechanical entity entirely, and instead merely have it as a cosmetic thing. You're wearing light armor, but one step better than leather? Call it "leather cuirass along with metal arm guards" all you like, but mechanically, it's just Studded Leather. You want better protection than with a Chain Shirt, maybe by adding something to protect your forearms? Sorry, but that's just so much metal that it bumps your armor up to medium. "Chain Shirt plus metal arm guards" may be your description, but by the rules, you're now wearing what amounts to Chainmail. You want to "go unarmored, but block the occasional blow with your metal wristguards"? Well, mechanically, you're now wearing Padded armor. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bracers that stack?
Top