Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Aus_Snow" data-source="post: 4852567" data-attributes="member: 29112">*chuckles* Nooo, why would anyone take offence at that? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> But, by all means, you are entitled to your opinion of the book. Even if I happen to disagree completely with your analysis (if not vehemently; I just don't care enough for that). <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />But how you got from there to here. . . does the book really offend your sensibilities so much that you would wish it out of existence (or further proliferation, anyway) when, well, it must be perfectly clear to you that many M&M GMs and players have had, and will most likely continue to have, good results from using it? Unless this was an elaborate jest/trolling, and I'm just missing the point. . . <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/ponder.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":hmm:" title="Hmmm    :hmm:" data-shortname=":hmm:" />*shrug* Oh well, either way, good score Jeff - the prices I've seen lately have been pretty horrific.</blockquote>