Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
You Don’t Have To Leave Wolfy Behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' Your Companions Level Up With You!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Brainstorming an Alt-Dimension/Quasi-Star Trek setting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 8102666" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>So, thinking on my own question, I think the answer somewhat depends on the question of why Rome doesn't fall. It helps set the basis we are working from.</p><p></p><p>One possibility - Rome doesn't fall, because it doesn't become the Imperial Rome we know. Perhaps Julius never crosses the Rubicon. Or maybe, when he's assassinated, the <em>optimates'</em> view held - they killed Julius Caesar, Mark Antony, and several of the others, leading to a shaky but successful return to the republican form - we have the Roman Imperial Republic...</p><p></p><p>But nobody wants to model the Republic. They want to model the Empire with a Ceasar. So, let us consider the more common points of failure.</p><p></p><p>To quote a common text of Wikipedia, "The Roman Empire lost the strengths that had allowed it to exercise effective control over its Western provinces; modern historians posit factors including the effectiveness and numbers of the army, the health and numbers of the Roman population, the strength of the economy, the competence of the Emperors, the internal struggles for power, the religious changes of the period, and the efficiency of the civil administration. Increasing pressure from invading barbarians outside Roman culture also contributed greatly to the collapse."</p><p></p><p>So, setting aside a lot of fiddly-bit politics, there are a couple larger levers in there we might pull.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps the Romans work out that lead pipes are a phenomenally bad idea. As apocryphal as the impact of this may be, it works for our story - going into the 300s the Romans are in all ways just slightly better off. History otherwise goes ahead, but their economy, population, and general competence are higher, and fragmentation does not occur.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps Constantine I dies of a pox at an early age. He, and Constantius II, are never Emperor, and their abuses never happen. Christianity never becomes the official religion of the Empire. Juilan, not quite so burdened by the prior emperor's mistakes and abuses, is far more effective. He cleans up a lot of corrumption, and survives his Persian campaign, and does not cede any lands in the process. Having beaten both Germanic tries and Persians, the Empire is well-defended in the coming decades. Stilicho doesn't exist/happen. Our basis is then essentially a Julian Empire that has learned to control its taxation and while expansionist, is tolerant of many religions.</p><p></p><p>Either one of those works as a basis. Perhaps tomorrow, we can plow through a few other socioeconomic differences of this world that may give us some idea of what the future is like...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 8102666, member: 177"] So, thinking on my own question, I think the answer somewhat depends on the question of why Rome doesn't fall. It helps set the basis we are working from. One possibility - Rome doesn't fall, because it doesn't become the Imperial Rome we know. Perhaps Julius never crosses the Rubicon. Or maybe, when he's assassinated, the [I]optimates'[/I] view held - they killed Julius Caesar, Mark Antony, and several of the others, leading to a shaky but successful return to the republican form - we have the Roman Imperial Republic... But nobody wants to model the Republic. They want to model the Empire with a Ceasar. So, let us consider the more common points of failure. To quote a common text of Wikipedia, "The Roman Empire lost the strengths that had allowed it to exercise effective control over its Western provinces; modern historians posit factors including the effectiveness and numbers of the army, the health and numbers of the Roman population, the strength of the economy, the competence of the Emperors, the internal struggles for power, the religious changes of the period, and the efficiency of the civil administration. Increasing pressure from invading barbarians outside Roman culture also contributed greatly to the collapse." So, setting aside a lot of fiddly-bit politics, there are a couple larger levers in there we might pull. Perhaps the Romans work out that lead pipes are a phenomenally bad idea. As apocryphal as the impact of this may be, it works for our story - going into the 300s the Romans are in all ways just slightly better off. History otherwise goes ahead, but their economy, population, and general competence are higher, and fragmentation does not occur. Perhaps Constantine I dies of a pox at an early age. He, and Constantius II, are never Emperor, and their abuses never happen. Christianity never becomes the official religion of the Empire. Juilan, not quite so burdened by the prior emperor's mistakes and abuses, is far more effective. He cleans up a lot of corrumption, and survives his Persian campaign, and does not cede any lands in the process. Having beaten both Germanic tries and Persians, the Empire is well-defended in the coming decades. Stilicho doesn't exist/happen. Our basis is then essentially a Julian Empire that has learned to control its taxation and while expansionist, is tolerant of many religions. Either one of those works as a basis. Perhaps tomorrow, we can plow through a few other socioeconomic differences of this world that may give us some idea of what the future is like... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Brainstorming an Alt-Dimension/Quasi-Star Trek setting
Top