Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Brainstorming Daze
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BobTheNob" data-source="post: 5549023" data-attributes="member: 82425"><p>Gotta throw in with agreement on prior threads. Stun is tough, but daze (in our game) has sit a little more comfortably. The few occasions when it was entered battle its effect has been about right. Denial of action, but not too much denial of action. That statement goes both ways as well, both for the situations where it has worked in the parties favor and when it has worked against them.</p><p></p><p>To try and so radically change it has alot of flow on effects. Alot of powers that use daze have niggly damage or effects otherwise, said powers will be made a far less attractive option. What about when daze is the consequence on a power (i.e. when you use this power you daze yourself), all of a sudden said power becomes hyper-good.</p><p></p><p>Focusing purely on your suggestion, there is an ocean on difference in efficacy between it an vanilla Daze. Im not going to tell you that my game experience is yours, but with Daze feeling so "right" to me, the impact of your change is, to me, too much.</p><p></p><p>If you find daze too much, might I suggest (and this is something I have been thinking for a while</p><p>* Daze = One standard action on turn</p><p>* Stun = One standard action on turn and grant CA</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BobTheNob, post: 5549023, member: 82425"] Gotta throw in with agreement on prior threads. Stun is tough, but daze (in our game) has sit a little more comfortably. The few occasions when it was entered battle its effect has been about right. Denial of action, but not too much denial of action. That statement goes both ways as well, both for the situations where it has worked in the parties favor and when it has worked against them. To try and so radically change it has alot of flow on effects. Alot of powers that use daze have niggly damage or effects otherwise, said powers will be made a far less attractive option. What about when daze is the consequence on a power (i.e. when you use this power you daze yourself), all of a sudden said power becomes hyper-good. Focusing purely on your suggestion, there is an ocean on difference in efficacy between it an vanilla Daze. Im not going to tell you that my game experience is yours, but with Daze feeling so "right" to me, the impact of your change is, to me, too much. If you find daze too much, might I suggest (and this is something I have been thinking for a while * Daze = One standard action on turn * Stun = One standard action on turn and grant CA [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Brainstorming Daze
Top