Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vigilance" data-source="post: 302245" data-attributes="member: 4275">LegitimacyWell... as I see it there are a couple of issues involved.&nbsp; Judged strictly on the quality of the work, I think WOTC would win a heads up competition with any small publisher.&nbsp; Wizards can afford the best art, the best layout people, the best writers, can afford any licensing property it wants, etc.&nbsp; Only one publisher could really compete with Wizards in any of these areas, and that publisher is White Wolf. So, I think in a lot of categories Wizards would be the hands down favorite every year.&nbsp; There's no point in whining or trying to rig the game for the small 3rd party publishers.&nbsp; Its the difference between playing for the Yankees and playing for Royals.That said, I think the Ennies should represent small companies too.Just one writer's opinion <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Vigilance, post: 302245, member: 4275"] [b]Legitimacy[/b] Well... as I see it there are a couple of issues involved. Judged strictly on the quality of the work, I think WOTC would win a heads up competition with any small publisher. Wizards can afford the best art, the best layout people, the best writers, can afford any licensing property it wants, etc. Only one publisher could really compete with Wizards in any of these areas, and that publisher is White Wolf. So, I think in a lot of categories Wizards would be the hands down favorite every year. There's no point in whining or trying to rig the game for the small 3rd party publishers. Its the difference between playing for the Yankees and playing for Royals. That said, I think the Ennies should represent small companies too. Just one writer's opinion :) [/QUOTE]

Verification