Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Branstorming for ENnies 2003 -- improvements, changes, etc
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ghostwind" data-source="post: 303746" data-attributes="member: 3060"><p>I strongly believe that any attempt to censure or limit a single company's participation in the ENnie' would completely undermine any credibility that awards have now achieved. You cannot say "company X can now no longer enter the awards because we don't like the fact that they won nearly every category." To do so would kill any prestige that the awards brings. You have to open it to everyone or else it is meaningless. It is the responsibility of the selection committee to make sure the product is placed in the proper category, beyond that it is up to the fans who vote. The fans chose Wotc products in this case. End of story.</p><p></p><p>The creation of additional categories will help diversify the awards and open them up for other companies to get nominated where otherwise they may not. If one of the changes made is the exclusion of products that are not OGC, then once again you are tampering with the prestige of the awards. A possible solution would be the creation of two or three d20 non-ogc categories that would serve for products that have no ogc such as Kenzer or Wotc's stuff.</p><p></p><p>I am completely against the concept of more than one award in a category. To me, this cheapens the whole awards. As it stands right now, it is a huge deal to be nominated and an even bigger deal to win. If you now give awards to two or three of the nominees, suddenly being nominated means nothing. Furthermore, the second and third place awards will not carry the same weight or meaning. As a writer, if my product was the sole winner it would really mean something to me. But if my product was one of three awards given in that category, it would not be nearly as important to me, especially if there were only five nominees in that category.</p><p> </p><p>Leave the awards as they are and work on refining how selection, judging and the number of categories works. Changes at that end will help refine and smooth the process and not affect the status of the awards themselves.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ghostwind, post: 303746, member: 3060"] I strongly believe that any attempt to censure or limit a single company's participation in the ENnie' would completely undermine any credibility that awards have now achieved. You cannot say "company X can now no longer enter the awards because we don't like the fact that they won nearly every category." To do so would kill any prestige that the awards brings. You have to open it to everyone or else it is meaningless. It is the responsibility of the selection committee to make sure the product is placed in the proper category, beyond that it is up to the fans who vote. The fans chose Wotc products in this case. End of story. The creation of additional categories will help diversify the awards and open them up for other companies to get nominated where otherwise they may not. If one of the changes made is the exclusion of products that are not OGC, then once again you are tampering with the prestige of the awards. A possible solution would be the creation of two or three d20 non-ogc categories that would serve for products that have no ogc such as Kenzer or Wotc's stuff. I am completely against the concept of more than one award in a category. To me, this cheapens the whole awards. As it stands right now, it is a huge deal to be nominated and an even bigger deal to win. If you now give awards to two or three of the nominees, suddenly being nominated means nothing. Furthermore, the second and third place awards will not carry the same weight or meaning. As a writer, if my product was the sole winner it would really mean something to me. But if my product was one of three awards given in that category, it would not be nearly as important to me, especially if there were only five nominees in that category. Leave the awards as they are and work on refining how selection, judging and the number of categories works. Changes at that end will help refine and smooth the process and not affect the status of the awards themselves. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Branstorming for ENnies 2003 -- improvements, changes, etc
Top