Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Branstorming for ENnies 2003 -- improvements, changes, etc
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tmaaas" data-source="post: 304987" data-attributes="member: 6481"><p><strong>Weighting votes</strong></p><p></p><p>It seems that one of the biggest issues is how to reduce the effect circulation size has on the awards. The problem is that a lesser product with a large distribution will probably beat a superior product with a small distribution in a popularity contest. </p><p></p><p>Would it be possible in the voting to also mark how many of the products in each category you have actually reviewed/read/used/etc. and feel qualified to judge between [1 to 5], and then weight the results accordingly? (Having a 0 option would also satisfy the 'opt out' requests that others have made; your vote could be ignored. But an explicit 'opt out' option would probably be better.)</p><p></p><p>Personally, if I've only read two of five products in a category and vote for one of those two, I would not consider my vote as significant as someone who was knowledgeable about all five products. Of course, marking how many products in each category you feel you are qualified to judge would depend on the honor system, but I trust the integrity of most voters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tmaaas, post: 304987, member: 6481"] [b]Weighting votes[/b] It seems that one of the biggest issues is how to reduce the effect circulation size has on the awards. The problem is that a lesser product with a large distribution will probably beat a superior product with a small distribution in a popularity contest. Would it be possible in the voting to also mark how many of the products in each category you have actually reviewed/read/used/etc. and feel qualified to judge between [1 to 5], and then weight the results accordingly? (Having a 0 option would also satisfy the 'opt out' requests that others have made; your vote could be ignored. But an explicit 'opt out' option would probably be better.) Personally, if I've only read two of five products in a category and vote for one of those two, I would not consider my vote as significant as someone who was knowledgeable about all five products. Of course, marking how many products in each category you feel you are qualified to judge would depend on the honor system, but I trust the integrity of most voters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Branstorming for ENnies 2003 -- improvements, changes, etc
Top