Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Branstorming for ENnies 2003 -- improvements, changes, etc
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magestrike" data-source="post: 305969" data-attributes="member: 6259"><p><strong>My opinions...for what they are worth</strong></p><p></p><p>I have followed this thread with great interest over the past few days, and I must say that there are a lot of very good opinions on here about what happened and what to do. Some I agree with; others I do not.</p><p></p><p>On most of the opinions, I must say that for my money, I agree with Clark. Again, in a storm of chaos and confusion, Clark reigns in with the voice of simplicity and reason.</p><p></p><p>Wizards is not a d20 publisher. They just arent.</p><p></p><p>Is this the inherent problem? Yes and no. They dont have to follow the license like every one else does, therefore they simply have an advantage over every other publisher. However, the most basic problem here isnt that fact. The problem is this. </p><p></p><p>What is an ENnie and what is it supposed to stand for?</p><p></p><p>This is the question that needs to be answered and all the confusion in this thread is moot until it is. </p><p></p><p>Is it supposed to be a reflection of the RPG market and the best there is in it? If so, Wizards should be included.</p><p></p><p>Is it supposed to be a reflection of the d20 market? Then Wizards shouldnt be included.</p><p></p><p>I think it boils down to those two basic questions. Once those are answered, then everything else falls into place. I do agree and like the idea about Wizards taking themselves out of contention and joining forces to sponsor the event. Thats a good idea. </p><p></p><p>On the topic of what winning/being nominated for an ENnie means to a publisher, I also have an opinion. I was involved with both Thunderhead products that were nominated this year, and I can tell you that when I saw that they had been put up, I was estactic. THG put out two products before joining with MEG, and both were nominated. I know the team that was involved with both and how much blood, sweat and tears went into producing both. Being nominated with the possibility of winning, in my opinion, means a great deal and meant a GREAT deal to the team. Whether it affects sales and whatnot I cant comment on. But I do know that it made a regular guy with a regular job, a family, and a regular life outside of the "industry" EXTREMELY happy. Thanks for the opportunity.</p><p></p><p>In closing, I would like to say congratulations to all the nominees, the winners, the judges, the publishers, the fans, the ENWorld crew and everyone else involved. Wonderful job.</p><p></p><p><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Warren</p><p>"aka Mage"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magestrike, post: 305969, member: 6259"] [b]My opinions...for what they are worth[/b] I have followed this thread with great interest over the past few days, and I must say that there are a lot of very good opinions on here about what happened and what to do. Some I agree with; others I do not. On most of the opinions, I must say that for my money, I agree with Clark. Again, in a storm of chaos and confusion, Clark reigns in with the voice of simplicity and reason. Wizards is not a d20 publisher. They just arent. Is this the inherent problem? Yes and no. They dont have to follow the license like every one else does, therefore they simply have an advantage over every other publisher. However, the most basic problem here isnt that fact. The problem is this. What is an ENnie and what is it supposed to stand for? This is the question that needs to be answered and all the confusion in this thread is moot until it is. Is it supposed to be a reflection of the RPG market and the best there is in it? If so, Wizards should be included. Is it supposed to be a reflection of the d20 market? Then Wizards shouldnt be included. I think it boils down to those two basic questions. Once those are answered, then everything else falls into place. I do agree and like the idea about Wizards taking themselves out of contention and joining forces to sponsor the event. Thats a good idea. On the topic of what winning/being nominated for an ENnie means to a publisher, I also have an opinion. I was involved with both Thunderhead products that were nominated this year, and I can tell you that when I saw that they had been put up, I was estactic. THG put out two products before joining with MEG, and both were nominated. I know the team that was involved with both and how much blood, sweat and tears went into producing both. Being nominated with the possibility of winning, in my opinion, means a great deal and meant a GREAT deal to the team. Whether it affects sales and whatnot I cant comment on. But I do know that it made a regular guy with a regular job, a family, and a regular life outside of the "industry" EXTREMELY happy. Thanks for the opportunity. In closing, I would like to say congratulations to all the nominees, the winners, the judges, the publishers, the fans, the ENWorld crew and everyone else involved. Wonderful job. :) Warren "aka Mage" [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Branstorming for ENnies 2003 -- improvements, changes, etc
Top