Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Yaarel" data-source="post: 9266590" data-attributes="member: 58172">Heh, it is even odder to lack a Psion class.That said. The &quot;Jedi&quot; Knight concept has much popculture traction and recognition and appeal.It is worth having the Psi Warrior in its own right in the Players Handbook. Meanwhile, its existence in the Core books is a nod that the Psionic power source exists and other psionic classes and subclasses can (and probably will) exist in future splatbooks.Meanwhile, even the 2014 Monster Manual mentions Psionic monsters, and defines it as &quot;innate spell casting&quot;. The player-facing Players Handbook needs to mention the Psionic class options too.Also, the Glossary needs to detail exactly what &quot;innate spells&quot; and &quot;innate spell casting&quot; are, how they lack any spell component, and technically distinguishable, what &quot;casting without a spell slot&quot; means, exactly. The Glossary Entry that itemizes all of it can be &quot;INNATE&quot;.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Yaarel, post: 9266590, member: 58172"] Heh, it is even odder to lack a Psion class. That said. The "Jedi" Knight concept has much popculture traction and recognition and appeal. It is worth having the Psi Warrior in its own right in the Players Handbook. Meanwhile, its existence in the Core books is a nod that the Psionic power source exists and other psionic classes and subclasses can (and probably will) exist in future splatbooks. Meanwhile, even the 2014 Monster Manual mentions Psionic monsters, and defines it as "innate spell casting". The player-facing Players Handbook needs to mention the Psionic class options too. Also, the Glossary needs to detail exactly what "innate spells" and "innate spell casting" are, how they lack any spell component, and technically distinguishable, what "casting without a spell slot" means, exactly. The Glossary Entry that itemizes all of it can be "INNATE". [/QUOTE]

Verification