Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Brawler Style, free hands, and having a target grabbed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Radiating Gnome" data-source="post: 5118721" data-attributes="member: 150"><p>Another point. cribbed from my email conversation with Chzbro, who is my DM:</p><p></p><p>"Your "poor man's daze" comparison is really overstating the case. The grab does not remove a move action, only limits the options that the creature has for that move action. The creature still has the action, and can use it for a variety of other things. I also have to hit with my attack every round to sustain it (every power that grants the grab states that the grab ends at the end of my next turn, so they can't be sustained indefinitely).</p><p></p><p>Also, don't lose sight of the idea that what the brawler is doing is totally available to any other character. ANY character can grab a target and limit it's ability to move. The brawler is better at it, because of the build's investment in being good at it, but that doesn't mean that the gnome rogue in the party can't grab a target with HIS free hand and prevent it from moving away. </p><p></p><p>Compare this to Combat Superiority. Now, it's entirely possible that you could have a brawler style fighter with combat superiority rather than combat agility, but even so -- is a grab that prevents a single target from using a move action to move away really so much more powerful than a class feature that allows the fighter to attack ANY target that moves away from him, do damage AND stop that movement. In that case the fighter DOES negate some or all of the move action (because the target can't choose to do something else with it, he's used it) and gets to do damage. </p><p></p><p>Also, the grab attacks are limited by situation and target. Combat Superiority and other fighter builds work against all sorts of targets -- an Ooze or a swarm, for example. Now, there's no RAW that prevents a brawler from grabbing an ooze or a swarm, but I don't think any DM would allow it. But there's no question that combat superiority would work against it. Is it really that much more powerful?"</p><p></p><p>-rg</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Radiating Gnome, post: 5118721, member: 150"] Another point. cribbed from my email conversation with Chzbro, who is my DM: "Your "poor man's daze" comparison is really overstating the case. The grab does not remove a move action, only limits the options that the creature has for that move action. The creature still has the action, and can use it for a variety of other things. I also have to hit with my attack every round to sustain it (every power that grants the grab states that the grab ends at the end of my next turn, so they can't be sustained indefinitely). Also, don't lose sight of the idea that what the brawler is doing is totally available to any other character. ANY character can grab a target and limit it's ability to move. The brawler is better at it, because of the build's investment in being good at it, but that doesn't mean that the gnome rogue in the party can't grab a target with HIS free hand and prevent it from moving away. Compare this to Combat Superiority. Now, it's entirely possible that you could have a brawler style fighter with combat superiority rather than combat agility, but even so -- is a grab that prevents a single target from using a move action to move away really so much more powerful than a class feature that allows the fighter to attack ANY target that moves away from him, do damage AND stop that movement. In that case the fighter DOES negate some or all of the move action (because the target can't choose to do something else with it, he's used it) and gets to do damage. Also, the grab attacks are limited by situation and target. Combat Superiority and other fighter builds work against all sorts of targets -- an Ooze or a swarm, for example. Now, there's no RAW that prevents a brawler from grabbing an ooze or a swarm, but I don't think any DM would allow it. But there's no question that combat superiority would work against it. Is it really that much more powerful?" -rg [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Brawler Style, free hands, and having a target grabbed
Top