Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Rystil Arden" data-source="post: 3577671" data-attributes="member: 29014">(OOC: By RAW, there is 0% risk in Searching for traps (especially since you can search from 10 feet away by RAW, which may not even be close enough to trigger it.&nbsp; It is indeed true that you cannot take 10 or take 20 on Disable Device because of the risk of setting it off.&nbsp; You have them mixed up again <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />EDIT: Oh, and just for the heck of it, even though it was voted &quot;most superfluous rule in all of D&amp;D&quot; on another thread here, there is a rule by RAW that&nbsp; EDIT #2: Oh, and since it's built into stone, that's another +2 from the dwarf stonecunning (this does indeed apply to magical traps as well as long as they are built into stone, like the obelisj--see the Search table in the SRD/PHB where the little note indicates this) )</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Rystil Arden, post: 3577671, member: 29014"] (OOC: By RAW, there is 0% risk in Searching for traps (especially since you can search from 10 feet away by RAW, which may not even be close enough to trigger it. It is indeed true that you cannot take 10 or take 20 on Disable Device because of the risk of setting it off. You have them mixed up again ;) EDIT: Oh, and just for the heck of it, even though it was voted "most superfluous rule in all of D&D" on another thread here, there is a rule by RAW that EDIT #2: Oh, and since it's built into stone, that's another +2 from the dwarf stonecunning (this does indeed apply to magical traps as well as long as they are built into stone, like the obelisj--see the Search table in the SRD/PHB where the little note indicates this) ) [/QUOTE]

Verification