Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Breaking free of eTools reliance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Birmy" data-source="post: 3548156" data-attributes="member: 50221"><p>Was wondering this myself after you brought it up (I'm not all that familiar with the Tome of Battle or Magic), and a query over at Lone Wolf's forums (they tend to be pretty direct and thorough over there) netted this response:</p><p></p><p><em>Hero Lab is pretty good at supporting that stuff right now, but it could definitely be better. This is something that we're currently focusing on within the d20 data files. Allow me to explain... </em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>The HL engine can support everything in those books, but the d20 data files don't currently expose everything in the engine for easy use within the d20 data files. Probably about 80% of the material in the major D&D supplements can be readily implemented within the existing d20 data files. Another 15% can be implemented with a non-trivial amount of work. And the remaining 5% either isn't able to be integrated yet or could technically be done right now, but would be more trouble than it's worth. </em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>In a nutshell, we're in the classic situation of the 80/20 rule. You know the one. The first 80% of the project takes the first 80% of the time and the second 20% of the project takes the other 80% of the time. </em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Colen and I recently went through the majority of the major D&D supplements, including those you listed, to assess what we need to do to make it relatively easy to add the 20% that isn't currently easy. We mapped out a number of changes and new approaches in the d20 data files that we plan on implementing in the next update (next week) and a second update in June. Those changes should get the numbers up to about 95% of the supplement material being readiliy addable, 4% being a bit of work, and 1% either being not possible or more work than it's worth. That remaining 5% will take a bit longer to fully address, and we'll be working to keep refining things in subsequent updates to systematically reach the 99% mark for readily doable and 1% a fair bit of work. Due to some of the insanity with certain obscure races, feats, classes, and the like, it's unrealistic to think any tool could reasonably reach 100% support for easily adding new material. There will always be a few wacky things that would take days for us to accommodate readily and that no one will probably ever try to add to the data files. So that handful of things will end up being the doable, but require a fair bit of work to accomplish. </em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>-Rob</em></p><p></p><p>--which jibes with what I've experienced so far and seems like a pretty fair assessment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Birmy, post: 3548156, member: 50221"] Was wondering this myself after you brought it up (I'm not all that familiar with the Tome of Battle or Magic), and a query over at Lone Wolf's forums (they tend to be pretty direct and thorough over there) netted this response: [i]Hero Lab is pretty good at supporting that stuff right now, but it could definitely be better. This is something that we're currently focusing on within the d20 data files. Allow me to explain... The HL engine can support everything in those books, but the d20 data files don't currently expose everything in the engine for easy use within the d20 data files. Probably about 80% of the material in the major D&D supplements can be readily implemented within the existing d20 data files. Another 15% can be implemented with a non-trivial amount of work. And the remaining 5% either isn't able to be integrated yet or could technically be done right now, but would be more trouble than it's worth. In a nutshell, we're in the classic situation of the 80/20 rule. You know the one. The first 80% of the project takes the first 80% of the time and the second 20% of the project takes the other 80% of the time. Colen and I recently went through the majority of the major D&D supplements, including those you listed, to assess what we need to do to make it relatively easy to add the 20% that isn't currently easy. We mapped out a number of changes and new approaches in the d20 data files that we plan on implementing in the next update (next week) and a second update in June. Those changes should get the numbers up to about 95% of the supplement material being readiliy addable, 4% being a bit of work, and 1% either being not possible or more work than it's worth. That remaining 5% will take a bit longer to fully address, and we'll be working to keep refining things in subsequent updates to systematically reach the 99% mark for readily doable and 1% a fair bit of work. Due to some of the insanity with certain obscure races, feats, classes, and the like, it's unrealistic to think any tool could reasonably reach 100% support for easily adding new material. There will always be a few wacky things that would take days for us to accommodate readily and that no one will probably ever try to add to the data files. So that handful of things will end up being the doable, but require a fair bit of work to accomplish. -Rob[/i] --which jibes with what I've experienced so far and seems like a pretty fair assessment. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Breaking free of eTools reliance
Top