Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Patryn of Elvenshae" data-source="post: 1873839" data-attributes="member: 23094">Shall I point out my *other* responses&nbsp; in the thread, or would that just be a little too pedantic for you?So lay off the insults and insulting tone of post.In other words, I posted what I did because the discussion seemed to be focusing on an incorrect assumption - that paladins were prohibited from fathering / mothering children and being married.&nbsp; In other words, the discussion from the initial post seemed to be more about celibate paladins than chaste paladins.By the by, it depends on which part of the Musketeer tale you intend to emulate.&nbsp; Aramis, by my recollection, was a bit of a womanizer but grew out of it, eventually joining the priesthood and becoming the head of the Jesuits (at least those in Paris) - thus becoming bound by vows of both chastity and celibacy.Perhaps Porthos is more in the vein you're looking for?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Patryn of Elvenshae, post: 1873839, member: 23094"] Shall I point out my *other* responses in the thread, or would that just be a little too pedantic for you? So lay off the insults and insulting tone of post. In other words, I posted what I did because the discussion seemed to be focusing on an incorrect assumption - that paladins were prohibited from fathering / mothering children and being married. In other words, the discussion from the initial post seemed to be more about [b]celibate[/b] paladins than chaste paladins. By the by, it depends on which part of the Musketeer tale you intend to emulate. Aramis, by my recollection, was a bit of a womanizer but grew out of it, eventually joining the priesthood and becoming the head of the Jesuits (at least those in Paris) - thus becoming bound by vows of both chastity and celibacy. Perhaps Porthos is more in the vein you're looking for? [/QUOTE]

Verification