Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Bringing back weapon speed!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Coredump" data-source="post: 944334" data-attributes="member: 6939"><p>It is interesting that you have completely opposite claims for weapons and creatures. You emphatically claim that weapon speed is all relative, and can only be interpreted with other factores involved, nothing can be inherrent; yet you claim the exact opposite for creatures and CR, specifically that CR is completely inherrent, and should be calculated with disregard to any other factors.</p><p></p><p>Further, it is interesting that when you offer multiple 'explanations' and I systematically show how they do not apply, you decide that my 'attitude' is the problem, and refuse to address the issues. Not that you have ever bothered to show where my 'attitude' has impacted my assertions. At least I gave clear examples of your arrogance. You simply make a claim, and assume that is enough to get you off the hook of having to back up what you state as 'fact'.</p><p></p><p>OTOH, if you *really* want to claim, here in public, that a GS fighter and dagger fighter, standing in range, will not even hit each other..... well, I am willing to let that stand for your credibility all by itself.</p><p></p><p>As for reading comprehension: I never made the claim of 3:1 for the GS:dagger fight. You should pay more attention before trying to blow someone off. I made very detailed assertions, and you have chosen to disregard them, I spent time and energy disputing your claims, and you decided to disregard them. Fine, but if you are going to abandon your position, don't make excuses about my attitude.</p><p></p><p>Attitude; yes, my initial post was directed pretty pointedly right at you. But re-read that post, (and several since) you have made far reaching claims, as if you are the only one with enough knowledge to have "The Answer"; The arrogance in claiming that *your* opinion would be the end of the discussion was amazing. But it was not the only case of arrogance. Of course, I documented those, you just cast random dispersions and run.</p><p></p><p>I wish Dave would have come back and responded, it would have been interesting to hear what he had to say.</p><p></p><p>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Coredump, post: 944334, member: 6939"] It is interesting that you have completely opposite claims for weapons and creatures. You emphatically claim that weapon speed is all relative, and can only be interpreted with other factores involved, nothing can be inherrent; yet you claim the exact opposite for creatures and CR, specifically that CR is completely inherrent, and should be calculated with disregard to any other factors. Further, it is interesting that when you offer multiple 'explanations' and I systematically show how they do not apply, you decide that my 'attitude' is the problem, and refuse to address the issues. Not that you have ever bothered to show where my 'attitude' has impacted my assertions. At least I gave clear examples of your arrogance. You simply make a claim, and assume that is enough to get you off the hook of having to back up what you state as 'fact'. OTOH, if you *really* want to claim, here in public, that a GS fighter and dagger fighter, standing in range, will not even hit each other..... well, I am willing to let that stand for your credibility all by itself. As for reading comprehension: I never made the claim of 3:1 for the GS:dagger fight. You should pay more attention before trying to blow someone off. I made very detailed assertions, and you have chosen to disregard them, I spent time and energy disputing your claims, and you decided to disregard them. Fine, but if you are going to abandon your position, don't make excuses about my attitude. Attitude; yes, my initial post was directed pretty pointedly right at you. But re-read that post, (and several since) you have made far reaching claims, as if you are the only one with enough knowledge to have "The Answer"; The arrogance in claiming that *your* opinion would be the end of the discussion was amazing. But it was not the only case of arrogance. Of course, I documented those, you just cast random dispersions and run. I wish Dave would have come back and responded, it would have been interesting to hear what he had to say. . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Bringing back weapon speed!
Top