Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bronze and Brass Dragons vs. Iron and Adamantine Dragons: Which do you prefer?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="QuietBrowser" data-source="post: 6956639" data-attributes="member: 6855057"><p>Just something inspired by a positive thread I read on 4e D&D's MM2... amongst the many, many changes that 4th edition made to its monsters was to take two of the traditional Metallic Dragons, the Bronze and the Brass, and to replace them in the core MM with two new ones; the Iron Dragon was a tough, forest & gully-dwelling brute of a metallic, sort of the metal dragon counterpart to the Chromatics' White Dragon, whilst the Adamantine Dragon was a deep-dwelling metallic of great power and rarity, superior even to the Gold Dragon in some ways, but focused on the Underdark. Both Bronze and Brass did return in the Metallic Draconomicon, but their place as "core metallics" was given over to Iron and Adamantine.</p><p></p><p></p><p>This was ultimately changed back in 5th edition, as was almost every other damn thing that 4e did, but it's left me wondering: what do people think of the two? Do people prefer one pair to the other? Or can you actually enjoy both of them equally? Would you rather have Bronze and Brass, or Iron and Adamantine?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Speaking personally... I'd rather have Iron and Adamantine, hand's down. The Bronze and the Brass have never made a lot of sense to me, nor have they ever interested me - they're freaking copper alloys, and it shows; visually and mechanically, they're more tweaks of the Copper Dragon than anything really unique. One was, I think, a really mercenary dragon eager to amass treasure, whilst the other was a petty warlord who claimed a just cause - I can't really remember them, so maybe that's only their 4e versions.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Iron and Adamantine, on the other hand... for starters, they just sound a better fit; I mean, which feels more organic to you? Adamantine/Gold/Silver/Copper/Iron? Or Gold/Silver/Copper/Bronze/Brass? The Iron Dragon filled a very unique role by being the Metallic's "savage", the embarrassing low-tier brute that the others try to pretend doesn't exist, ala the Chromatics with the White Dragon. The Adamantine Dragon, meanwhile, gives us a truly fantasy metal to base a dragon on, and is unique with its thunder blast breath weapon and its ultra-durable hide.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Anyway, that's my opinion. What's yours?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="QuietBrowser, post: 6956639, member: 6855057"] Just something inspired by a positive thread I read on 4e D&D's MM2... amongst the many, many changes that 4th edition made to its monsters was to take two of the traditional Metallic Dragons, the Bronze and the Brass, and to replace them in the core MM with two new ones; the Iron Dragon was a tough, forest & gully-dwelling brute of a metallic, sort of the metal dragon counterpart to the Chromatics' White Dragon, whilst the Adamantine Dragon was a deep-dwelling metallic of great power and rarity, superior even to the Gold Dragon in some ways, but focused on the Underdark. Both Bronze and Brass did return in the Metallic Draconomicon, but their place as "core metallics" was given over to Iron and Adamantine. This was ultimately changed back in 5th edition, as was almost every other damn thing that 4e did, but it's left me wondering: what do people think of the two? Do people prefer one pair to the other? Or can you actually enjoy both of them equally? Would you rather have Bronze and Brass, or Iron and Adamantine? Speaking personally... I'd rather have Iron and Adamantine, hand's down. The Bronze and the Brass have never made a lot of sense to me, nor have they ever interested me - they're freaking copper alloys, and it shows; visually and mechanically, they're more tweaks of the Copper Dragon than anything really unique. One was, I think, a really mercenary dragon eager to amass treasure, whilst the other was a petty warlord who claimed a just cause - I can't really remember them, so maybe that's only their 4e versions. Iron and Adamantine, on the other hand... for starters, they just sound a better fit; I mean, which feels more organic to you? Adamantine/Gold/Silver/Copper/Iron? Or Gold/Silver/Copper/Bronze/Brass? The Iron Dragon filled a very unique role by being the Metallic's "savage", the embarrassing low-tier brute that the others try to pretend doesn't exist, ala the Chromatics with the White Dragon. The Adamantine Dragon, meanwhile, gives us a truly fantasy metal to base a dragon on, and is unique with its thunder blast breath weapon and its ultra-durable hide. Anyway, that's my opinion. What's yours? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bronze and Brass Dragons vs. Iron and Adamantine Dragons: Which do you prefer?
Top