Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Khitan" data-source="post: 5752241" data-attributes="member: 6686547">Problem is I really hate the idea behind the ninja... as I hate monks (and samurai, wu jen, and so on in 3.5). I simply can't see the oriental classes in D&D and PF^^" Then again the only manual I can use are Core and APG^^" About the Rake... There's something I can't quite grasp... it seems to me to much of a show off, even for my tastes (and I really like showoff characters xD) I still prefer the acrobat or the swashbuckler.You're right... not what I want^^ But thanks for the tip.Ok^^ It was just an idea, I never really considered itI still prefer starting with the rogue, more skill points and a lot more flavour. I don't really care about min/maxing with this PC so it's not a big problem for me^^About the dips: Fighter and Ranger are possible choices, the other 2 aren't for BG's reasons xD But the question still stands... is better to stick to the rogue or to multiclass? And I'll add a new question: why (eventually) multiclassing with ranger?No: only possible races are humans and half-elves. I have a really clear picture of the PC in my mind and he can be only a human or an half-elf^^ I'm actually tending to the half-elf, the bonus Skill Focus + the other stuff is simply more attractive than just (just?? xD) one talent and one skill point.</blockquote>