Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="engrishonly" data-source="post: 5423816" data-attributes="member: 38460">Cool. I'm going to number them to facilitate discussion...1) Much nicer! Specificity helps me a lot. Questing for specifics is much better for me. I can already see the potential sources for this.2) It's okay. Not enough conflict in it. I think it's necessary to have a Belief about another character, or about the party. This might require more info about Vellekhyr. For instance, does the Elf approve of Ferrantos' harvesting of brains & parts from the slain?3) Love this one. If the half-brother Auromos had a bigger role in the setting/situation, then it would be even cooler. As he is, (a minor NPC), he could be a Knight, stationed at the Keep.4) Kind of works, and could be a solid 3rd Belief. If it ties to the situation, or a relationship, then it would be stronger. It's also a little broad. Keep it razor sharp, "I will lie under these circumstances" or "I will steal under these conditions". "Noblemen took my heritage, so I will never willingly speak truth to nobles", ferinstance. Then the Arthas triggers will be clear, and I can't ignore the thing that is happening.5) Is kind of nebulous for my tastes, and the skill thing maybe works better in Instincts.1) Solid.2) So Ferrantos needs the brains of a sharp enemy? It's cool, but I think the Belief is enough. This might handcuff you with too much specificity (only when you have a corpse of an enemy).3) It can work. I think it might help to have a temporal trigger. "Before the evening meal" or "When seated in front of a fire" or something.4) Great. This works well in a group with religious tendencies.5) Sleep is cool, but only if you think it's a problematic thing.6) I like #4 better.Using the advice from the AdBu, #1 & #3 & #4 are the types of things you should have.</blockquote>

Verification