Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Business Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shadzar" data-source="post: 5431596" data-attributes="member: 6667746"><p>No, I just think with a company in which money is the ONLY driving force, then the game itself will not be as important as it might be those those who play it.</p><p></p><p>I thought we were talking about WotC business decisions? Gary didn't sell the game, it was taken from him by trying to get investors and selling shares of the company...he just brought in the wrong people. It isnt like Adkinson deciding to sell WotC to HASBRO.</p><p></p><p>The developers of MANY recent editions have been controlled, by those seeking to use the game for ONE purpose. Under such high stress and control, you don't expect those artisans to be at there best (See D&D books gutted and DDi scheduling/calendar changes).</p><p></p><p>I don't think some of the developers of the past, or the current ones should be anywhere near gaming. That doesn't mean others that should be have any real say or control. Didn't HASBRO force a direction of something in regards to "number of books sold" related to a comparison of children's books and the differences in revenue each was getting and D&D had to start meeting a quota?</p><p></p><p>The consumer doesn't buy things because they want to help you make money as a business. They buy things that they think are quality products. So the best way to get the consumer to willingly hand over their money so you get more, is to give them a quality product, and bean-counters look only at the revenue stream and ways to increase it rather than care if the product has any quaility.</p><p></p><p>So it has to be someone that cares about the product (not brand), in order to remove the good money after bad element.</p><p></p><p>I could mention other good examples related to banks TARP funds, etc...but that would probably divert too much into politics, but shows where the idea of a smaller group of focused people could probably do better than putting all your eggs in one basket so you save money on buying extra baskets. So it depends on what type of omelet you are wanting to make, but either way, you still have to break a few of those eggs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shadzar, post: 5431596, member: 6667746"] No, I just think with a company in which money is the ONLY driving force, then the game itself will not be as important as it might be those those who play it. I thought we were talking about WotC business decisions? Gary didn't sell the game, it was taken from him by trying to get investors and selling shares of the company...he just brought in the wrong people. It isnt like Adkinson deciding to sell WotC to HASBRO. The developers of MANY recent editions have been controlled, by those seeking to use the game for ONE purpose. Under such high stress and control, you don't expect those artisans to be at there best (See D&D books gutted and DDi scheduling/calendar changes). I don't think some of the developers of the past, or the current ones should be anywhere near gaming. That doesn't mean others that should be have any real say or control. Didn't HASBRO force a direction of something in regards to "number of books sold" related to a comparison of children's books and the differences in revenue each was getting and D&D had to start meeting a quota? The consumer doesn't buy things because they want to help you make money as a business. They buy things that they think are quality products. So the best way to get the consumer to willingly hand over their money so you get more, is to give them a quality product, and bean-counters look only at the revenue stream and ways to increase it rather than care if the product has any quaility. So it has to be someone that cares about the product (not brand), in order to remove the good money after bad element. I could mention other good examples related to banks TARP funds, etc...but that would probably divert too much into politics, but shows where the idea of a smaller group of focused people could probably do better than putting all your eggs in one basket so you save money on buying extra baskets. So it depends on what type of omelet you are wanting to make, but either way, you still have to break a few of those eggs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Business Discussion
Top