Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
By The Book: New Religions, Schisms and Bigotry
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 3566968" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>By definition.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Round things are round by definition.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Back to 'by definition'. I would say however, that where you seem to be confused with what I'm saying, is that if we don't assume dieties are incarnations of abstract concepts, then the proof by definition goes away. Of course, way back at the beginning I assumed this as a viable alternative assumption when I made the suggestion, 'What if you are ideas?'. I don't have to prove its the only possibility, just that its a viable one. You don't have to accept that assumption, but it is the sort of assumption most polytheistic religions eventually adopt as thier philosophy matures (Greek polytheism and Hindu polytheism both move in this direction) and IMO opinion it makes for a more intriguing cosmology to have things as alien as incarnated ideas. </p><p></p><p>At least, I agree with Socrates that it makes more sense than thinking gods are silly little twits. Of course, look where it got Socrates. </p><p></p><p>In any event, what I've been trying to prove is not that there is one way to do it, but in fact the opposite of that. (In fact, a really intriguing scenario is that mortals don't know which theory is true and bicker about it just like the Greeks did.) Of course, beyond that I'd like to suggest that my way is more interesting and gives you more to think about, but I'm not out to prove that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If mortals are beholden to do good (that is, if there is a such thing as good) and if there is a divine plan of goodness, mortals are beholden to practice it according to the divine plan. Again, Plato-like, the mortals are not capable of even percieving clearly what good is (they can't define it), and so any knowledge of good that they have must be a divinely granted shadow of the real knowledge of good. So, if follows, that mortals are beholden to try to seek out and practice the divine knowledge of good as best as they can.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't see how that follows from either philosophical stance.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It doesn't work if you don't have some idea of what reality should be.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 3566968, member: 4937"] By definition. Round things are round by definition. Back to 'by definition'. I would say however, that where you seem to be confused with what I'm saying, is that if we don't assume dieties are incarnations of abstract concepts, then the proof by definition goes away. Of course, way back at the beginning I assumed this as a viable alternative assumption when I made the suggestion, 'What if you are ideas?'. I don't have to prove its the only possibility, just that its a viable one. You don't have to accept that assumption, but it is the sort of assumption most polytheistic religions eventually adopt as thier philosophy matures (Greek polytheism and Hindu polytheism both move in this direction) and IMO opinion it makes for a more intriguing cosmology to have things as alien as incarnated ideas. At least, I agree with Socrates that it makes more sense than thinking gods are silly little twits. Of course, look where it got Socrates. In any event, what I've been trying to prove is not that there is one way to do it, but in fact the opposite of that. (In fact, a really intriguing scenario is that mortals don't know which theory is true and bicker about it just like the Greeks did.) Of course, beyond that I'd like to suggest that my way is more interesting and gives you more to think about, but I'm not out to prove that. If mortals are beholden to do good (that is, if there is a such thing as good) and if there is a divine plan of goodness, mortals are beholden to practice it according to the divine plan. Again, Plato-like, the mortals are not capable of even percieving clearly what good is (they can't define it), and so any knowledge of good that they have must be a divinely granted shadow of the real knowledge of good. So, if follows, that mortals are beholden to try to seek out and practice the divine knowledge of good as best as they can. I don't see how that follows from either philosophical stance. It doesn't work if you don't have some idea of what reality should be. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
By The Book: New Religions, Schisms and Bigotry
Top