Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Turanil" data-source="post: 2129270" data-attributes="member: 9646">I really don't like traditional AD&amp;D multiclassing, as it IMO allows munchkinism until 10th level (my last multiclassed character in AD&amp;D was a cleric-wizard from 1st to 15th level, so I know what I am saying). However, your method as I see it could allow it. Two classes, with best BtH and best hit-dice, and prime and special abilities of the two added together. You climb to next level when you have enough XP for the next level of the two classes that requires the more XP, and at the same time have colected XP for the two classes. That means, you must get XP for the two classes (keeping track of the two progressions apart).I will see if I can allow this sytem in addition to a regular 3e multiclassing as I suggest.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Otherwise, as for another houserule:I was reading yesterday two AD&amp;D complete handbooks that I saw could be used in a C&amp;C campaign (for adventures): Complete Gladiator's Handbook, and Complete Book of Necromancers. I clearly see that I can use kits for at least NPCs.For PCs: I was considering adding feats (at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, etc.) levels to add power and customizations, and because I like the idea of feats. However, 90% of 3e feats cannot be added to C&amp;C obviously, they are incompatible IMO. On the other hand, I have seen that many &quot;special advantages&quot; of 2e kits could be turned into &quot;C&amp;C feats&quot;. For example I could well see a &quot;nobility&quot; feat: You get a +3 bonus to Charisma checks plus special in-game advantages (such as being allowed into the king's court, request hospitality from other nobles, etc.), but provided you have a castle, a valid nobility title, and relevant luxury equipment, and spends more money than others. This feat could be got at 1st level, but a character who makes a fortune at higher level and becomes a Lord during the course of the adventures could get this &quot;feat&quot;.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Turanil, post: 2129270, member: 9646"] I really don't like traditional AD&D multiclassing, as it IMO allows munchkinism until 10th level (my last multiclassed character in AD&D was a cleric-wizard from 1st to 15th level, so I know what I am saying). However, your method as I see it could allow it. Two classes, with best BtH and best hit-dice, and prime and special abilities of the two added together. You climb to next level when you have enough XP for the next level of the two classes that requires the more XP, and at the same time have colected XP for the two classes. That means, you must get XP for the two classes (keeping track of the two progressions apart). I will see if I can allow this sytem in addition to a regular 3e multiclassing as I suggest. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Otherwise, as for another houserule: I was reading yesterday two AD&D complete handbooks that I saw could be used in a C&C campaign (for adventures): [I]Complete Gladiator's Handbook[/I], and [I]Complete Book of Necromancers[/I]. I clearly see that I can use kits for at least NPCs. For PCs: I was considering adding feats (at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, etc.) levels to add power and customizations, and because I like the idea of feats. However, 90% of 3e feats cannot be added to C&C obviously, they are incompatible IMO. On the other hand, I have seen that many "special advantages" of 2e kits could be turned into "C&C feats". For example I could well see a "nobility" feat: You get a +3 bonus to Charisma checks plus special in-game advantages (such as being allowed into the king's court, request hospitality from other nobles, etc.), but provided you have a castle, a valid nobility title, and relevant luxury equipment, and spends more money than others. This feat could be got at 1st level, but a character who makes a fortune at higher level and becomes a Lord during the course of the adventures could get this "feat". [/QUOTE]

Verification