Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[C&C] Taking Down the Stone Giants
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Treebore" data-source="post: 4097503" data-attributes="member: 10177"><p>Arcane eye requires concentration or it goes inert. Plus the spell description would say spells could be cast through it if allowed. It doesn't, so its impossible to cast spells through it. Plus you can't "concentrate" on two different spells at the same time, which is what would have to happen to use both the eye (to maintain line of sight at all times) and the Projected Image at the same time.</p><p></p><p>Now you could have allowed him to break these rules by making a SIEGE check to maintain all those spells at the same time. CL=to all the spells levels added together. So a CL of 13 for a fireball, arcane eye, and Projected Image all being done at the same time. Which would be a TN of 25. I generally add a general +3 CL modifier to such SIEGE checks. So it would be at least a TN 28 if I were to decide to let it happen.</p><p></p><p>So going by the spell descriptions, no, the mage couldn't have done what he did. However, there is no reason why you couldn't have allowed a SIEGE check to let them pull it off anyways.</p><p></p><p>So in this situation you can say you had them do a SIEGE check (each time they cast a new spell) and just decided to assume they succeeded each time, but in the future SIEGE checks will be made and failure will mean the loss of all involved spells from memory for the day.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Treebore, post: 4097503, member: 10177"] Arcane eye requires concentration or it goes inert. Plus the spell description would say spells could be cast through it if allowed. It doesn't, so its impossible to cast spells through it. Plus you can't "concentrate" on two different spells at the same time, which is what would have to happen to use both the eye (to maintain line of sight at all times) and the Projected Image at the same time. Now you could have allowed him to break these rules by making a SIEGE check to maintain all those spells at the same time. CL=to all the spells levels added together. So a CL of 13 for a fireball, arcane eye, and Projected Image all being done at the same time. Which would be a TN of 25. I generally add a general +3 CL modifier to such SIEGE checks. So it would be at least a TN 28 if I were to decide to let it happen. So going by the spell descriptions, no, the mage couldn't have done what he did. However, there is no reason why you couldn't have allowed a SIEGE check to let them pull it off anyways. So in this situation you can say you had them do a SIEGE check (each time they cast a new spell) and just decided to assume they succeeded each time, but in the future SIEGE checks will be made and failure will mean the loss of all involved spells from memory for the day. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[C&C] Taking Down the Stone Giants
Top