Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bregh" data-source="post: 2058302" data-attributes="member: 9285">I am rapidly leaning towards a new C&amp;C campaign in favour of both my current OAD&amp;D campaign (ongoing since 1994, will be a straight-over conversion) and my latest d20 campaign, but I won't be abandoning my OD&amp;D campaign (too much fun, and such a breeze to run/play: accept no substitutes <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> ).The big appeal for me in C&amp;C, aside from its sweet resolution mechanic (slicker than deer guts on linolium, IMO) is the ease of conversion for gaming material from both OAD&amp;D and d20/3rd edition. My Necromancer Games modules can be &quot;converted&quot; during play, as can my OAD&amp;D modules, with just an eyeball reference to a handful of stats. For me, that is a dream come true. (It goes without saying that homebrew modules benefit from this, as well, no matter what edition I wrote them for). For that convenience alone, and for C&amp;C's ability to accomplish it, I can hardly curb my enthusiasm for the new system.Issues re: layout, typos? Not for me. Fer cryin out loud, Classic OD&amp;D (the little booklets) are the source for my main (and most favourite, atm, campaign), so obviously these issues for me are of little consequence. I can see the point that others may be making, but in the main, I feel some complaints have been exaggerated. My daily newspaper is far, far worse, but, hey, mileages vary.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Bregh, post: 2058302, member: 9285"] I am rapidly leaning towards a new C&C campaign in favour of both my current OAD&D campaign (ongoing since 1994, will be a straight-over conversion) and my latest d20 campaign, but I won't be abandoning my OD&D campaign (too much fun, and such a breeze to run/play: accept no substitutes ;) ). The big appeal for me in C&C, aside from its sweet resolution mechanic (slicker than deer guts on linolium, IMO) is the ease of conversion for gaming material from both OAD&D and d20/3rd edition. My Necromancer Games modules can be "converted" during play, as can my OAD&D modules, with just an eyeball reference to a handful of stats. For me, that is a dream come true. (It goes without saying that homebrew modules benefit from this, as well, no matter what edition I wrote them for). For that convenience alone, and for C&C's ability to accomplish it, I can hardly curb my enthusiasm for the new system. Issues re: layout, typos? Not for me. Fer cryin out loud, Classic OD&D (the little booklets) are the source for my main (and most favourite, atm, campaign), so obviously these issues for me are of little consequence. I can see the point that others may be making, but in the main, I feel some complaints have been exaggerated. My daily newspaper is far, far worse, but, hey, mileages vary. [/QUOTE]

Verification