Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 1927419" data-attributes="member: 2011">Only if making two choices means you only really make one choice. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Many of those feats have also been in the game for years. It seems likely that a designer did not even consider the possibility for Precocious Apprentice.But when you are talking the spending of two entire feats, I think most DMs are not going to care about 2 spell slots and 2 different spells.There really is not much different between this feat and other feats that allow a choice (e.g. Weapon Specialization) except that this is a brand new feat that people have not asked WotC questions on as much.I agree that your interpretation is the literal rule, but I also think that since all other &quot;choice&quot; feats do allow the feat to be taken multiple times, that this feat should not necessarily be an exception to that trend.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 1927419, member: 2011"] Only if making two choices means you only really make one choice. ;) Many of those feats have also been in the game for years. It seems likely that a designer did not even consider the possibility for Precocious Apprentice. But when you are talking the spending of two entire feats, I think most DMs are not going to care about 2 spell slots and 2 different spells. There really is not much different between this feat and other feats that allow a choice (e.g. Weapon Specialization) except that this is a brand new feat that people have not asked WotC questions on as much. I agree that your interpretation is the literal rule, but I also think that since all other "choice" feats do allow the feat to be taken multiple times, that this feat should not necessarily be an exception to that trend. [/QUOTE]

Verification