Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[CA] Practiced Spellcaster, Caster level x prereq, and PrC's
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 1927634" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>I suspect that it is possible that the thought never entered their minds.</p><p></p><p>Have you ever written a gaming product? I have. You spend man months on it, trying to handle every little contingency that someone might think of. But, there is often over a hundred pages to work on and a lot of little nuances. You do not really spend more than 10 minutes thinking on any one feat, there is too much other work to keep in sync.</p><p></p><p>Then, within 5 minutes of a products release, somebody comes up with a question that you never considered. And it goes from one question to dozens of questions, to maybe even hundreds of questions.</p><p></p><p>So yes, I think it is very conceivable that taking it twice was a thought not even on their radar at the time, especially since all other choice feats do allow you to take them multiple times. It's possible that they thought about it and figured that the normal feat rules handle it. Or, it's possible that they did not.</p><p></p><p>Every time there is an exception to the normal feat rules, they call it out. So if this is an exception to the normal "choice" feat rules (all of which have the multiple take special listed), they should have called it out precisely because rules lawyer DMs will rule the one way and "try to extrapolate from what you see presented there" DMs might rule another way. By being totally clear on something, it prevents ambiguity.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 1927634, member: 2011"] I suspect that it is possible that the thought never entered their minds. Have you ever written a gaming product? I have. You spend man months on it, trying to handle every little contingency that someone might think of. But, there is often over a hundred pages to work on and a lot of little nuances. You do not really spend more than 10 minutes thinking on any one feat, there is too much other work to keep in sync. Then, within 5 minutes of a products release, somebody comes up with a question that you never considered. And it goes from one question to dozens of questions, to maybe even hundreds of questions. So yes, I think it is very conceivable that taking it twice was a thought not even on their radar at the time, especially since all other choice feats do allow you to take them multiple times. It's possible that they thought about it and figured that the normal feat rules handle it. Or, it's possible that they did not. Every time there is an exception to the normal feat rules, they call it out. So if this is an exception to the normal "choice" feat rules (all of which have the multiple take special listed), they should have called it out precisely because rules lawyer DMs will rule the one way and "try to extrapolate from what you see presented there" DMs might rule another way. By being totally clear on something, it prevents ambiguity. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[CA] Practiced Spellcaster, Caster level x prereq, and PrC's
Top