Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Swarmkeeper" data-source="post: 8423326" data-attributes="member: 6921763">See above.&nbsp; As per my previous answer, I think DCs on their own in published adventures can be misleading at best.&nbsp; If I were writing a module, I'd adjust the description to let the DM decide the DC but give them some advice on what might happen on failure.FWIW, I do think [USER=6779196]@Charlaquin[/USER]'s answer is solid.&nbsp; DCs, as they exist, are most likely based on first tier individual PCs with middling scores and proficiency OR PCs with medium-high scores and no-proficiency (amounting to +2 to +3 modifiers).&nbsp; Good advice for DMs looking to calibrate DCs on the fly.I... am?&nbsp; Or at least I am trying to -- where &quot;contributing positively&quot; = &quot;sharing my thoughts in hopes of learning something that will help our table... while possibly providing a viewpoint that might help others at their tables&quot;.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Swarmkeeper, post: 8423326, member: 6921763"] See above. As per my previous answer, I think DCs on their own in published adventures can be misleading at best. If I were writing a module, I'd adjust the description to let the DM decide the DC but give them some advice on what might happen on failure. FWIW, I do think [USER=6779196]@Charlaquin[/USER]'s answer is solid. DCs, as they exist, are most likely based on first tier individual PCs with middling scores and proficiency OR PCs with medium-high scores and no-proficiency (amounting to +2 to +3 modifiers). Good advice for DMs looking to calibrate DCs on the fly. I... am? Or at least I am trying to -- where "contributing positively" = "sharing my thoughts in hopes of learning something that will help our table... while possibly providing a viewpoint that might help others at their tables". [/QUOTE]

Verification