Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Argyle King" data-source="post: 9652703" data-attributes="member: 58416">Because1) doing that thought excercise first would allow for better forethought into how something ought to be written so as to avoid potential issues and abuses of the law's intent. Writing a law without thought toward what it will actually do once implemented seems a poor way to govern.and2) My previous post were done while multitasking and unable to read the law.That being said, some of the thoughts I had do appear to be reflected in the wording. How &quot;AI&quot; is defined within the law is somewhat vague in Secton 1, 3115, definition 'a'.&quot;(a) 'Artificial intelligence' or 'AI' means an engineered or machine-based system that varies in its level of autonomy and that can, for explicit or implicit objectives, infer from the input it receives how to generate outputs that can influence physical or virtual environments...&quot;&nbsp;A 'machine-based system' (which can mean a wide variety of things) that can use inputed information (of any type of input) to generate an output that can Influence physical or virtual environments covers a lot of territory as a definition.Later in the law, the definition of &quot;generative AI&quot; provides more guidance. &quot;(d) 'Generative artificial intelligence' or 'GenAI' means an artificial intelligence system that can generate derived synthetic content, including text, images, video, and audio, that emulates the structure and characteristics of the system’s training data.&quot;That narrows it down some, but I can still imagine ways in which that could be construed to mean it covers things that I don't believe this law is intended to cover.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Argyle King, post: 9652703, member: 58416"] Because 1) doing that thought excercise first would allow for better forethought into how something ought to be written so as to avoid potential issues and abuses of the law's intent. Writing a law without thought toward what it will actually do once implemented seems a poor way to govern. and 2) My previous post were done while multitasking and unable to read the law. That being said, some of the thoughts I had do appear to be reflected in the wording. How "AI" is defined within the law is somewhat vague in Secton 1, 3115, definition 'a'. "(a) 'Artificial intelligence' or 'AI' means an engineered or machine-based system that varies in its level of autonomy and that can, for explicit or implicit objectives, infer from the input it receives how to generate outputs that can influence physical or virtual environments..." A 'machine-based system' (which can mean a wide variety of things) that can use inputed information (of any type of input) to generate an output that can Influence physical or virtual environments covers a lot of territory as a definition. Later in the law, the definition of "generative AI" provides more guidance. "(d) 'Generative artificial intelligence' or 'GenAI' means an artificial intelligence system that can generate derived synthetic content, including text, images, video, and audio, that emulates the structure and characteristics of the system’s training data." That narrows it down some, but I can still imagine ways in which that could be construed to mean it covers things that I don't believe this law is intended to cover. [/QUOTE]

Verification