Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jfdlsjfd" data-source="post: 9652989" data-attributes="member: 42856">It's not fair. I said it can be a goal. If you want to get rich, you don't want competition. Erasing competition through legal barriers of entry is a way to achieve that. Fair? Probably not. Possible? As long as a majority people support bills enacting those barriers. Effective? Sure.Honestly, providing a clicky webservice instead of having to go through the complexity of installing a piece of software at home is convenient enough that several companies exist doing just that, including running the exact same models than anyone can run at home. Nobody is having to pay, but many chooses to, for convenience.My guess is that even if your watch was able to run generative video models, there would still be people who'd be customers for having it available without effort. Anyone can cook, yet ubereats exist. How much is anyone accepting to pay for something they can do at home is the big question.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jfdlsjfd, post: 9652989, member: 42856"] It's not fair. I said it can be a goal. If you want to get rich, you don't want competition. Erasing competition through legal barriers of entry is a way to achieve that. Fair? Probably not. Possible? As long as a majority people support bills enacting those barriers. Effective? Sure. Honestly, providing a clicky webservice instead of having to go through the complexity of installing a piece of software at home is convenient enough that several companies exist doing just that, including running the exact same models than anyone can run at home. Nobody is having to pay, but many chooses to, for convenience. My guess is that even if your watch was able to run generative video models, there would still be people who'd be customers for having it available without effort. Anyone can cook, yet ubereats exist. How much is anyone accepting to pay for something they can do at home is the big question. [/QUOTE]

Verification