Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="chuckdee" data-source="post: 9713011" data-attributes="member: 6804357">Or... hear me out here... perhaps there should be a Human safeguarding any final decisions? Reminds me of DOGE and what the developer said - he developed the waste AI (and he's not experienced on doing so) to give recommendations for a human to take a deeper look into. I personally think that's a totally valid use of AI.They wanted to save money now, so instead of having a human look through it and evaluate the smaller sample set, used it as gospel.And to people that just say no AI and the solution is to dismantle the AI, there's a lot of scut work that leads to burnout, especially with heavy workloads in bursts. You hire people to handle the heavier workload and you have too many people when the workload lessens. You don't hire people (which most companies choose to do) and you burn out your workers. Instead you use AI to help you to manage that workload, and concentrate on the percentage of the job that requires your full attention, instead of multi-tasking doing stuff that's really beneath your pay grade.</blockquote>