Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Called Shots?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ltheb Silverfrond" data-source="post: 3123501" data-attributes="member: 39867"><p>I was never a fan of called shots because if they are allowed, everyone will go for called shots to the head. (Or in whatever system used, for the one that prevents the foe from fighting back the best) </p><p></p><p>The simplest solution that I found to reduced headaches of adjucating unfair called shots is simply not to allow them; Going along with the "I can swing my sword far more than 5 times in 6 secounds" train of though, I find it best not to have the combat rolls not be a literal translation of what is happening, but the sum of it. </p><p></p><p>Example: A fighter with 4 attacks isn't attacking four times each round, but rather is engaged in a sword fight with his foe, and is parrying and dodging, and those four attacks he is entitled to a round are simply the number of attacks he can make that have a chance of landing, the sum of his skill, feinting, and reflexes. </p><p>I doubt a trained 20th level fighter's entire plan of attack is to nebulously swing his sword in the direction of his foe, hoping to defeat his foe's defences, and pierce his armor, while standing still for 6 secounds.</p><p></p><p>Called shots could simply be the critical hits, or the high-damage power attacks. A critical hit/wound table could best be used under this system to generate really gritty combat. </p><p>I found an extremely extensive critical wound table a while ago on a site, I think it was for hackmaster, but I converted it to d20. I ran it in a game, and it made for some brutal fights. (although the table was a bit unbalanced, either it wasn't worth rolling half the time, or the other half it was a total character crippler) The players though the table was pretty cool.</p><p>Sadly, I don't remember where I found the table, but if you wanted to use called shot rules, perhaps something like that could work.</p><p></p><p>Honestly I think for called shot rules Power Attack would be the best idea. It's nebulous, fair, and already balanced withing the current rules.</p><p>Called shot rules generally nudge the game a bit towards realism, and realism, from a balance standpoint is unfair. Realisticly, A direct Great axe hit to the torso kills, period. So the more "real" you make it, the more deadly combat is going to get. Just remember that when you plan out the evil archvillain, and flesh out every aspect of him, only for the PC archer to called shot his head and kill him before he can finish monologging. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ltheb Silverfrond, post: 3123501, member: 39867"] I was never a fan of called shots because if they are allowed, everyone will go for called shots to the head. (Or in whatever system used, for the one that prevents the foe from fighting back the best) The simplest solution that I found to reduced headaches of adjucating unfair called shots is simply not to allow them; Going along with the "I can swing my sword far more than 5 times in 6 secounds" train of though, I find it best not to have the combat rolls not be a literal translation of what is happening, but the sum of it. Example: A fighter with 4 attacks isn't attacking four times each round, but rather is engaged in a sword fight with his foe, and is parrying and dodging, and those four attacks he is entitled to a round are simply the number of attacks he can make that have a chance of landing, the sum of his skill, feinting, and reflexes. I doubt a trained 20th level fighter's entire plan of attack is to nebulously swing his sword in the direction of his foe, hoping to defeat his foe's defences, and pierce his armor, while standing still for 6 secounds. Called shots could simply be the critical hits, or the high-damage power attacks. A critical hit/wound table could best be used under this system to generate really gritty combat. I found an extremely extensive critical wound table a while ago on a site, I think it was for hackmaster, but I converted it to d20. I ran it in a game, and it made for some brutal fights. (although the table was a bit unbalanced, either it wasn't worth rolling half the time, or the other half it was a total character crippler) The players though the table was pretty cool. Sadly, I don't remember where I found the table, but if you wanted to use called shot rules, perhaps something like that could work. Honestly I think for called shot rules Power Attack would be the best idea. It's nebulous, fair, and already balanced withing the current rules. Called shot rules generally nudge the game a bit towards realism, and realism, from a balance standpoint is unfair. Realisticly, A direct Great axe hit to the torso kills, period. So the more "real" you make it, the more deadly combat is going to get. Just remember that when you plan out the evil archvillain, and flesh out every aspect of him, only for the PC archer to called shot his head and kill him before he can finish monologging. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Called Shots?
Top