Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DiFier" data-source="post: 879392" data-attributes="member: 2345">True, none of your current campaigns have collapsed but I think that it is because of you quality players and skills as a DM.&nbsp; but . . .*cough* teifling sorcerer casting darkness, centered on the demon, party in area of effect. 300 lb elven cook tying himself to the well and running around in circles yelling &quot;I don't eat food that falls on the ground&quot; while the bard and cleric duck he takes out the teifling and then the demon cuts the rope sending the fat elf careening into and through a peasant's house.&nbsp; &nbsp; *cough*&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> The current argument is weather a dual weilding sheilds is possible by the rules.&nbsp; The answer to that is that yes it is possible.&nbsp; it never says that you cannot use a shield in you primary hand but that a shield attack is treated as an off-hand attack.&nbsp; ambidexteriay and TWF then make it possible.&nbsp; Wheather dual weilding sheilds is silly is beside the point.&nbsp; That is up to your DM.&nbsp; I wouldn't play a dual weilding charachter.&nbsp; is it taking advantage of a combination of feats that the WOTC people never saw. perhaps.&nbsp; but again that is the DM's call.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Darklone.&nbsp; I sorta agree with you.&nbsp; especially with the shield and spear concept.&nbsp; I am not a medieval historian and I've never participated in a medevial battle.&nbsp; plus I can't spell.&nbsp; An interisting note tho.&nbsp; I have friends In the SCA and friends who used to be in the SCA and they have told me that the sword and board (shield) method is the most popular method of fighting.&nbsp; I haven't heard of any SCA fighter using 2 shields.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DiFier, post: 879392, member: 2345"] True, none of your current campaigns have collapsed but I think that it is because of you quality players and skills as a DM. but . . . *cough* teifling sorcerer casting darkness, centered on the demon, party in area of effect. 300 lb elven cook tying himself to the well and running around in circles yelling "I don't eat food that falls on the ground" while the bard and cleric duck he takes out the teifling and then the demon cuts the rope sending the fat elf careening into and through a peasant's house. *cough* :p The current argument is weather a dual weilding sheilds is possible by the rules. The answer to that is that yes it is possible. it never says that you cannot use a shield in you primary hand but that a shield attack is treated as an off-hand attack. ambidexteriay and TWF then make it possible. Wheather dual weilding sheilds is silly is beside the point. That is up to your DM. I wouldn't play a dual weilding charachter. is it taking advantage of a combination of feats that the WOTC people never saw. perhaps. but again that is the DM's call. Darklone. I sorta agree with you. especially with the shield and spear concept. I am not a medieval historian and I've never participated in a medevial battle. plus I can't spell. An interisting note tho. I have friends In the SCA and friends who used to be in the SCA and they have told me that the sword and board (shield) method is the most popular method of fighting. I haven't heard of any SCA fighter using 2 shields. [/QUOTE]

Verification