Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="daTim" data-source="post: 843144" data-attributes="member: 1797">Well, I think the problem with the Camelot Knights is they were such a romanticized version of knighthood it is quite unrealisitc. They were all upstanding citizens, defending the innocent women and children, with the upmost virtue. In reality Knights were trained killers from their birth, who rode animals trained to kill from birth. The nobility are the only people who had the free time to pursue lives of "virtue" and social lives, and they would never do any fighting. For a real Camelot style Knight you are best off with some sort of Paladin or Paladin Fighter multiclass. I cant think of any of the knights of the round table who were not LG. Sure they had their faults, but who doesnt. For a realisitc medieval knight, something like a Fighter/Cavalier, or even Fighter/Rogue would be a good representation, perhaps dabble a little into the nobility with skills, but in reality most knights lived and died as knights. Not nobility, but above peasants.</blockquote>