Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Inari" data-source="post: 1149684" data-attributes="member: 14554">Arright, a good point. I admit, it was originally a desperate attempt to squeeze in SR, but I do agree that it would be in order. So people do agree with the +2 to all saving throws. Would it be unbalanced to then also give the +2 to will vs. spells and spell-like abilities, like they normally have? Maybe reduce it to +1?Sounds good and dandy. It was originally the idea that the elite guards, the high rated assassins would be mageblades, so I feel somehow wrong about giving them a penalty to cha, as a stat... but would a -4 penalty to diplomacy, gather info, and such related skills be a bit better? That or no bonus to wisdom (either sounds like a viable idea to me, but I came here looking for a second opinion)Oops, my bad... Veil of Darkness is a lvl 1 spell, so the heightened form is only lvl 2 spell. Hope that ends that.No comment needed, you said it yourself.The right wording should be to have a -1 penalty when in bright situations (meaning a normal not-so-sunny day to us), but a -2 penalty when in direct sunlight (hence, the bright day. A strong sunset might even impose a -3 penalty). Hope that answers itWell, it might be in order to mention that dwarves don't get such insanely good benifits in the setting. Doesn't really concern this, but thought I might point it out.The thing is that like I said, all drow were originally another race, the Eldar, who are righty now the rulers of the lands. It might though be a good idea to remove the giantish language from that list.Anyways, thanks a lot for that output <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> I'm still open though to suggestions.</blockquote>

Verification