Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Campaign Setting - Pet Peeves
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 4523828" data-attributes="member: 29398"><p>How about technological back-sliding? A setting where, for example, technology was king 50,000 years ago but then blew itself out, allowing magic to slowly try to take over.</p><p></p><p>And societal change is easy...the simple fact of empires rising and falling is going to give rise to different societies over time no matter what the setting. That said, most published settings I've seen don't go into much detail on what made said historical societies different; guess that's left up to the DM.</p><p></p><p>My peeves with the generic settings are relatively few, as I'm quite happy with nothing's-perfect Euro-Tolkein as a base and several stated peeves in posts above are things I see as useful features. My peeves:</p><p></p><p>1. Unfamiliarity with its cultural base. Unless I already know it, I'm too lazy to want to learn everything about a setting's assumed culture just so I can run a game in it. So, no Al-Qadim for me. And no Planescape. And no (shudder!) Eberron.</p><p></p><p>2. Too much information. When it first came out in 1e, FR was an excellent setting. Then came all the gype piled on to it...the novels, the articles, the 2e and 3e and now 4e revisions...the poor horse has been flogged long past the point of death. The corollary problem here, of course, is those people who think that because a DM is using a given setting its established canon will at all times be faithfully adhered to....</p><p></p><p>3. Unwilling to mix historical eras. I *want* classical Greeks and Romans and dark-ages Norse and Celts and early-Renaissance Spaniards and English to all share the same world, along with Aztecs, Sumerians, aboriginal cultures, etc., never mind Dwarves and Elves (several kinds) and Gnomes and Hobbits. And monsters. Settings mostly seem either to want to stick to their own historical niche or to use no real-world-based cultures at all.</p><p></p><p>4. Thinking of FR in particular here, too many settled lands, not enough unexplored country. While this is easy enough for a DM to fix, having large tracts of land (like, say, about half a continent) be completely unknown to the "civilized" cultures gives a DM lots more to work with than if everything is known.</p><p></p><p>Lanefan</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lanefan, post: 4523828, member: 29398"] How about technological back-sliding? A setting where, for example, technology was king 50,000 years ago but then blew itself out, allowing magic to slowly try to take over. And societal change is easy...the simple fact of empires rising and falling is going to give rise to different societies over time no matter what the setting. That said, most published settings I've seen don't go into much detail on what made said historical societies different; guess that's left up to the DM. My peeves with the generic settings are relatively few, as I'm quite happy with nothing's-perfect Euro-Tolkein as a base and several stated peeves in posts above are things I see as useful features. My peeves: 1. Unfamiliarity with its cultural base. Unless I already know it, I'm too lazy to want to learn everything about a setting's assumed culture just so I can run a game in it. So, no Al-Qadim for me. And no Planescape. And no (shudder!) Eberron. 2. Too much information. When it first came out in 1e, FR was an excellent setting. Then came all the gype piled on to it...the novels, the articles, the 2e and 3e and now 4e revisions...the poor horse has been flogged long past the point of death. The corollary problem here, of course, is those people who think that because a DM is using a given setting its established canon will at all times be faithfully adhered to.... 3. Unwilling to mix historical eras. I *want* classical Greeks and Romans and dark-ages Norse and Celts and early-Renaissance Spaniards and English to all share the same world, along with Aztecs, Sumerians, aboriginal cultures, etc., never mind Dwarves and Elves (several kinds) and Gnomes and Hobbits. And monsters. Settings mostly seem either to want to stick to their own historical niche or to use no real-world-based cultures at all. 4. Thinking of FR in particular here, too many settled lands, not enough unexplored country. While this is easy enough for a DM to fix, having large tracts of land (like, say, about half a continent) be completely unknown to the "civilized" cultures gives a DM lots more to work with than if everything is known. Lanefan [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Campaign Setting - Pet Peeves
Top