Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Campaign Settings 5e- Why I want to Forget the Realms
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="the Jester" data-source="post: 6684156" data-attributes="member: 1210"><p>Hmm. Well, admittedly, I'm not a Realmlore guy, but I was under the impression that there was a RSE for the 3e transition- didn't they make major changes to the maps and stuff? Not just politically, but geographically? But maybe I'm wrong.</p><p></p><p>But the 4e RSE definitely counts. Just because it was mostly a 'remove-the-last-RSE' doesn't make it a not-RSE; just like the recent DC comics event that rewrote the whole shebang from Crisis on Infinite Earths onward was not a not-event because it retconned the retcons.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But the Greyhawk Wars weren't a "Realms-Shaking Event" level event. They didn't do a wholesale rewrite of the pantheon or shove a new continent onto the world. They were... a bunch of wars. Yes, they shook up the political landscape, but I hardly think they're comparable to the stuff that happens when the FR gets ready for a new edition or whatever. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Oh, no doubt, GH sticks all kinds of stuff in there... but it feels so much more coherent to me, despite the mountains more Realmslore that's out there. It's a matter of style and taste; to me, GH just feels like it's more... discriminating?... in the way it uses stuff. FR just kind of tacks a god from a historical pantheon or another setting in the mix without thinking twice, while GH tends to at least put a dose of paint on it to make it fit better. But I agree, GH loots material from everywhere shamelessly.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The npcs in GH don't dominate the GH setting material like they do in FR. They also aren't a bunch of heroes. They're a bunch of mostly-neutral, mostly self-interested guys trying to stop major imbalances from arising. They might be ultrapowerful, but they are restrained and act almost entirely behind the scenes. Whereas I see FR's approach as more "Look how many of our npcs are superheroes and supervillains!" I vastly prefer a world with fewer uber-npcs.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Iuz? Yeah, he's a demigod, and I think the original idea for demigods in D&D was that they were "almost-gods" that lived on the Prime Material. But I could be wrong about this; that's just what I've inferred from various things in the old WoG boxed set. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You say this like there aren't mountains of material waiting to be used as a source. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And I agree! But I don't agree on your reading of the facts. I think the differences are pretty deep, mostly in style and tone- but that's where the difference gets important. That is what makes me like WoG and dislike FR. And hell, I know a Renaissance style throw-it-all-in setting <em>can</em> work for me; I really like Eberron. But all the things that FR does poorly (for my taste) are things Eberron does well (npcs are low-level, the kitchen sink is piped in to the setting instead of sitting on top of the cake). </p><p></p><p>Like I said, it's a matter of taste and style. FR doesn't suit mine. That doesn't make it objectively bad; just <em>subjectively</em> bad (for me and others who feel similarly to me). </p><p></p><p>But again, the differences between FR and GH are far deeper than you credit. (Again, in my opinion.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="the Jester, post: 6684156, member: 1210"] Hmm. Well, admittedly, I'm not a Realmlore guy, but I was under the impression that there was a RSE for the 3e transition- didn't they make major changes to the maps and stuff? Not just politically, but geographically? But maybe I'm wrong. But the 4e RSE definitely counts. Just because it was mostly a 'remove-the-last-RSE' doesn't make it a not-RSE; just like the recent DC comics event that rewrote the whole shebang from Crisis on Infinite Earths onward was not a not-event because it retconned the retcons. But the Greyhawk Wars weren't a "Realms-Shaking Event" level event. They didn't do a wholesale rewrite of the pantheon or shove a new continent onto the world. They were... a bunch of wars. Yes, they shook up the political landscape, but I hardly think they're comparable to the stuff that happens when the FR gets ready for a new edition or whatever. Oh, no doubt, GH sticks all kinds of stuff in there... but it feels so much more coherent to me, despite the mountains more Realmslore that's out there. It's a matter of style and taste; to me, GH just feels like it's more... discriminating?... in the way it uses stuff. FR just kind of tacks a god from a historical pantheon or another setting in the mix without thinking twice, while GH tends to at least put a dose of paint on it to make it fit better. But I agree, GH loots material from everywhere shamelessly. The npcs in GH don't dominate the GH setting material like they do in FR. They also aren't a bunch of heroes. They're a bunch of mostly-neutral, mostly self-interested guys trying to stop major imbalances from arising. They might be ultrapowerful, but they are restrained and act almost entirely behind the scenes. Whereas I see FR's approach as more "Look how many of our npcs are superheroes and supervillains!" I vastly prefer a world with fewer uber-npcs. Iuz? Yeah, he's a demigod, and I think the original idea for demigods in D&D was that they were "almost-gods" that lived on the Prime Material. But I could be wrong about this; that's just what I've inferred from various things in the old WoG boxed set. You say this like there aren't mountains of material waiting to be used as a source. And I agree! But I don't agree on your reading of the facts. I think the differences are pretty deep, mostly in style and tone- but that's where the difference gets important. That is what makes me like WoG and dislike FR. And hell, I know a Renaissance style throw-it-all-in setting [i]can[/i] work for me; I really like Eberron. But all the things that FR does poorly (for my taste) are things Eberron does well (npcs are low-level, the kitchen sink is piped in to the setting instead of sitting on top of the cake). Like I said, it's a matter of taste and style. FR doesn't suit mine. That doesn't make it objectively bad; just [i]subjectively[/i] bad (for me and others who feel similarly to me). But again, the differences between FR and GH are far deeper than you credit. (Again, in my opinion.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Campaign Settings 5e- Why I want to Forget the Realms
Top