Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="rowport" data-source="post: 1677289" data-attributes="member: 9729">Well, Buzz, I'll tell you: I am thinking more and more about playing old school archetype D&D.  Since reading Merric's great thread about GG's AD&D interview (!) I am persuaded by the zen-like beauty of the simplicity of Diaglo's viewpoint about roleplaying making the character concept instead of rulessets.  There is something oddly compelling about rules-lite D&D with the oD&D "feel"; I think that 3.5E could still do the trick, but just as a rules engine skipping lots of the feats, etc. to keep it simple and fast.  I am a bit of a rules gearhead (with d20 and HERO, too) but would like to try the other side of the spectrum.  So, maybe using the Warrior, Spellcaster, Priest and Thief (sorry, Diaglo) in d20-lite with some Conanesque flavor would be a winner.Of course, you will have to run it, you slacker.And, you will never catch up on reading your game books- it is a logistical impossibility.   <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing    :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /></blockquote>