Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Can a caster tell if someone saved or not against their spell?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sword of Spirit" data-source="post: 8230767" data-attributes="member: 6677017"><p>"Otherwise, you <strong>perceive that the spell did nothing</strong> to the target."</p><p></p><p>That's the tricky part. It seems to suggest that if you are dealing with a spell that doesn't allow a saving throw, you automatically know (perceive) that it doesn't work when you cast it on an invalid target. This turns those (admittedly rare) spells into valid/invalid target detectors. That seems to run contrary to the tone of the section, which otherwise presents it so that you <em>don't</em> get to use <em>charm person</em> as "detect non-humanoid".</p><p></p><p>It's possible that it's just less than clear phrasing and the intent was something like, "Otherwise, you do not notice any effect from the spell." Or even better, that last sentence could just have been left out entirely, since that concept should follow from the rest of the section.</p><p></p><p>I'm probably going to stick with the idea that spells that don't require concentration are fire and forget, and your only way of knowing if they work is by observing the effects (either physically, or with magic such as <em>detect magic</em> or <em>identify</em>). For a concentration spell, I assume you know when the spell is using your concentration, so you know on that basis.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sword of Spirit, post: 8230767, member: 6677017"] "Otherwise, you [B]perceive that the spell did nothing[/B] to the target." That's the tricky part. It seems to suggest that if you are dealing with a spell that doesn't allow a saving throw, you automatically know (perceive) that it doesn't work when you cast it on an invalid target. This turns those (admittedly rare) spells into valid/invalid target detectors. That seems to run contrary to the tone of the section, which otherwise presents it so that you [I]don't[/I] get to use [I]charm person[/I] as "detect non-humanoid". It's possible that it's just less than clear phrasing and the intent was something like, "Otherwise, you do not notice any effect from the spell." Or even better, that last sentence could just have been left out entirely, since that concept should follow from the rest of the section. I'm probably going to stick with the idea that spells that don't require concentration are fire and forget, and your only way of knowing if they work is by observing the effects (either physically, or with magic such as [I]detect magic[/I] or [I]identify[/I]). For a concentration spell, I assume you know when the spell is using your concentration, so you know on that basis. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Can a caster tell if someone saved or not against their spell?
Top