Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can a monk use a ring of Force Shield?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sm!le" data-source="post: 9204939" data-attributes="member: 7043611"><p> <ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The interesting thing about this is that it does say "A character with an animated shield still takes any penalties associated with shield use, such as armor check penalty, arcane spell failure chance, and nonproficiency."Because it states this my guesses are:In Dungeons & Dragons 3.5e, the penalties associated with shield use, such as armor check penalty, arcane spell failure chance, and nonproficiency, are mentioned for the animated shield to maintain game balance. While the rules don't explicitly specify the reasons behind these penalties, players and Dungeon Masters are encouraged to use their imagination and common sense to interpret and apply the rules in a way that makes sense within the game world.Here are some possible reasons why an animated shield might incur penalties: (edited)<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Limited Visibility: As you mentioned, the animated shield might obstruct the wielder's vision. This limitation could make it more challenging for the character to perceive their surroundings, affecting skills like Spot and Search, and potentially contributing to the armor check penalty. Also getting in the way of your attacks.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Interference with Movement: The animated shield could hinder the character's movements, especially in situations that require agility or dexterity, such as climbing. It might get in the way or affect the character's ability to see and grab different handholds or branches.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Arcane Spell Failure: The magical nature of the animated shield may introduce complexities when casting arcane spells. The magical energies surrounding the shield might interfere with the precise gestures and incantations required for spellcasting, resulting in an arcane spell failure chance.</li> </ol>Remember, these are interpretations to provide logical explanations for the penalties. The Dungeon Master has the flexibility to adjust or modify these reasons based on the campaign setting and the specific magical properties of the animated shield in their world. It's always a good idea for players and DMs to discuss and agree on such interpretations to ensure a consistent and enjoyable gaming experience.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><br /> <img src="https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/1091869760762945616/1179363670392840192/image.png?ex=65798302&is=65670e02&hm=3e3d939026bd657c0114319374be317a738a088311118400de6510935d7eef4c&=&width=550&height=192" alt="Image" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /><br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><br /> <img src="https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/1091869760762945616/1179364429293436938/image.png?ex=657983b7&is=65670eb7&hm=2deb0bf6d487f152639ac332a7106991ac2189b8a544e8b8e23b67cc884efd01&=&width=550&height=171" alt="Image" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /><br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The Force Shield described in Dungeons & Dragons 3.5e is a magical ring that creates a shield-sized wall of force, and it comes with some unique properties that distinguish it from a traditional animated shield. Here are reasons why a Force Shield might not have the typical penalties associated with shield use:<ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">No Visibility Issues: Unlike an animated shield, the Force Shield is described as a wall of force. This implies that it doesn't obstruct the wearer's vision. The force field allows the character to see through it, eliminating the limitations on visibility that might come with a physical shield. This absence of visibility issues can justify the lack of an armor check penalty and arcane spell failure chance.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Weightless and Encumbrance-Free: The Force Shield is explicitly mentioned as weightless and encumbrance-free. This suggests that it doesn't interfere with the character's movements or impose any restrictions on their agility. As a result, there's no need for a nonproficiency penalty, and the character can move freely without hindrance.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Activation and Deactivation as a Free Action: The Force Shield can be activated and deactivated at will as a free action. This instantaneous and seamless control allows the character to bring up the shield only when needed, such as during combat, and dismiss it when it's not required. This flexibility contributes to the ease of use and justifies the lack of penalties.</li> </ol>In summary, the unique magical properties of the Force Shield, such as its transparency, lack of weight, and the ability to activate and deactivate it freely, are designed to mitigate the typical penalties associated with traditional shields. These properties make the Force Shield a more versatile and user-friendly option for characters, especially spellcasters who might want the benefits of a shield without the usual drawbacks.</li> </ol></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sm!le, post: 9204939, member: 7043611"] [LIST=1] [*]The interesting thing about this is that it does say "A character with an animated shield still takes any penalties associated with shield use, such as armor check penalty, arcane spell failure chance, and nonproficiency."Because it states this my guesses are:In Dungeons & Dragons 3.5e, the penalties associated with shield use, such as armor check penalty, arcane spell failure chance, and nonproficiency, are mentioned for the animated shield to maintain game balance. While the rules don't explicitly specify the reasons behind these penalties, players and Dungeon Masters are encouraged to use their imagination and common sense to interpret and apply the rules in a way that makes sense within the game world.Here are some possible reasons why an animated shield might incur penalties: (edited) [*][LIST=1] [*]Limited Visibility: As you mentioned, the animated shield might obstruct the wielder's vision. This limitation could make it more challenging for the character to perceive their surroundings, affecting skills like Spot and Search, and potentially contributing to the armor check penalty. Also getting in the way of your attacks. [*]Interference with Movement: The animated shield could hinder the character's movements, especially in situations that require agility or dexterity, such as climbing. It might get in the way or affect the character's ability to see and grab different handholds or branches. [*]Arcane Spell Failure: The magical nature of the animated shield may introduce complexities when casting arcane spells. The magical energies surrounding the shield might interfere with the precise gestures and incantations required for spellcasting, resulting in an arcane spell failure chance. [/LIST] Remember, these are interpretations to provide logical explanations for the penalties. The Dungeon Master has the flexibility to adjust or modify these reasons based on the campaign setting and the specific magical properties of the animated shield in their world. It's always a good idea for players and DMs to discuss and agree on such interpretations to ensure a consistent and enjoyable gaming experience. [*] [IMG alt="Image"]https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/1091869760762945616/1179363670392840192/image.png?ex=65798302&is=65670e02&hm=3e3d939026bd657c0114319374be317a738a088311118400de6510935d7eef4c&=&width=550&height=192[/IMG] [*] [IMG alt="Image"]https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/1091869760762945616/1179364429293436938/image.png?ex=657983b7&is=65670eb7&hm=2deb0bf6d487f152639ac332a7106991ac2189b8a544e8b8e23b67cc884efd01&=&width=550&height=171[/IMG] [*]The Force Shield described in Dungeons & Dragons 3.5e is a magical ring that creates a shield-sized wall of force, and it comes with some unique properties that distinguish it from a traditional animated shield. Here are reasons why a Force Shield might not have the typical penalties associated with shield use: [LIST=1] [*]No Visibility Issues: Unlike an animated shield, the Force Shield is described as a wall of force. This implies that it doesn't obstruct the wearer's vision. The force field allows the character to see through it, eliminating the limitations on visibility that might come with a physical shield. This absence of visibility issues can justify the lack of an armor check penalty and arcane spell failure chance. [*]Weightless and Encumbrance-Free: The Force Shield is explicitly mentioned as weightless and encumbrance-free. This suggests that it doesn't interfere with the character's movements or impose any restrictions on their agility. As a result, there's no need for a nonproficiency penalty, and the character can move freely without hindrance. [*]Activation and Deactivation as a Free Action: The Force Shield can be activated and deactivated at will as a free action. This instantaneous and seamless control allows the character to bring up the shield only when needed, such as during combat, and dismiss it when it's not required. This flexibility contributes to the ease of use and justifies the lack of penalties. [/LIST] In summary, the unique magical properties of the Force Shield, such as its transparency, lack of weight, and the ability to activate and deactivate it freely, are designed to mitigate the typical penalties associated with traditional shields. These properties make the Force Shield a more versatile and user-friendly option for characters, especially spellcasters who might want the benefits of a shield without the usual drawbacks. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can a monk use a ring of Force Shield?
Top