Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can a Mount be Surprised When the Rider is Not?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pressedcat" data-source="post: 3645566" data-attributes="member: 40736"><p>This is probably not RAW, but my inclination would be to have spot/listen rolled for both the rider and mount. If the mount fails its checks, the rider must pass a ride check in order to get the mount to move (or other passive actions) on his initiative in the surprise round if he is aware himself (such a check is a free action if i'm remembering correctly). Regardless of whether the rider succedes on this ride check or not (and so whether the mount gets to move passively), the mount still counts as flat footed as so is denied its dex etc.</p><p></p><p>Thus, an experienced rider not himself surprised will be able to control the mount well enough to make it move as he wants in the surpise round, whilst an inexperienced rider might struggle to get it to move. If the mount fails its spot/listen checks, it wont be able to act aggressively towards the enemy that it is unaware of and will be more vulnerable to its attacks whilst flat footed, but will still likely move as guided by its rider.</p><p></p><p>I figure this is a reasonably balanced solution, as a rider who's mount is surprised is not completely screwed in the surprise round, but neither does he get away with no consequencesfor failed checks. It might not be vital if you're riding a horse, but it would make much more difference if you happened to be riding a wolf etc at the time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pressedcat, post: 3645566, member: 40736"] This is probably not RAW, but my inclination would be to have spot/listen rolled for both the rider and mount. If the mount fails its checks, the rider must pass a ride check in order to get the mount to move (or other passive actions) on his initiative in the surprise round if he is aware himself (such a check is a free action if i'm remembering correctly). Regardless of whether the rider succedes on this ride check or not (and so whether the mount gets to move passively), the mount still counts as flat footed as so is denied its dex etc. Thus, an experienced rider not himself surprised will be able to control the mount well enough to make it move as he wants in the surpise round, whilst an inexperienced rider might struggle to get it to move. If the mount fails its spot/listen checks, it wont be able to act aggressively towards the enemy that it is unaware of and will be more vulnerable to its attacks whilst flat footed, but will still likely move as guided by its rider. I figure this is a reasonably balanced solution, as a rider who's mount is surprised is not completely screwed in the surprise round, but neither does he get away with no consequencesfor failed checks. It might not be vital if you're riding a horse, but it would make much more difference if you happened to be riding a wolf etc at the time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can a Mount be Surprised When the Rider is Not?
Top