Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can a Mount be Surprised When the Rider is Not?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="underfoot" data-source="post: 3646945" data-attributes="member: 53007"><p>The rules state that your mount acts on your initiative. It also states that only non-combat trained mounts are freightened by combat and require a ride check to control. Yes, your mount may take the spot check for the surprise round but it generally doesn't matter unless you have a non-combat trained mount. </p><p></p><p>Example 1a: A combat trained mount makes the spot check but the rider fails. The warhorse will not be freightened (unless invoked by a fear effect) and will wait for direction from his rider.</p><p></p><p>Example 1b: A combat trained mount fails the spot check but the rider makes it. The mount is surprised but still responds and acts on his riders initative (RAW).</p><p></p><p>Example 2a: A non-combat trained mount makes the spot check but the rider fails. If whatever the mount saw would cause it to be freightened, then the rider makes a ride check to control the mount on the riders initative (RAW). If the rider's check fails, then the horse acts like a freightened beast, fleeing from the source or fighting if cornered. </p><p></p><p>Example 2b: A non-combat trained mount fails the spot check but the rider makes it. The mount is surprised but still responds and acts on his riders initative (RAW). If the rider engages in combat then he must control the mount accordingly.</p><p></p><p>Note: The above examples assume the mount is of normal animal intelligence or not able to communicate with its rider. In the case of a mount capable of speach, telepathy, etc. It may react differently if it makes a spot check and his rider did not.</p><p></p><p>Conclusion: 1. Having a combat trained mount gives you a more reliable, easier to control and harder to freighten mount. 2. The RAW states that you use your initative for your mount and it acts on your turn. If your mount is surprised or not it uses your initative. 3. Is it worth your time to roll spot checks for combat trained mounts? No. Is it worth your time to roll spot checks for non-combat trained mounts? Yes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="underfoot, post: 3646945, member: 53007"] The rules state that your mount acts on your initiative. It also states that only non-combat trained mounts are freightened by combat and require a ride check to control. Yes, your mount may take the spot check for the surprise round but it generally doesn't matter unless you have a non-combat trained mount. Example 1a: A combat trained mount makes the spot check but the rider fails. The warhorse will not be freightened (unless invoked by a fear effect) and will wait for direction from his rider. Example 1b: A combat trained mount fails the spot check but the rider makes it. The mount is surprised but still responds and acts on his riders initative (RAW). Example 2a: A non-combat trained mount makes the spot check but the rider fails. If whatever the mount saw would cause it to be freightened, then the rider makes a ride check to control the mount on the riders initative (RAW). If the rider's check fails, then the horse acts like a freightened beast, fleeing from the source or fighting if cornered. Example 2b: A non-combat trained mount fails the spot check but the rider makes it. The mount is surprised but still responds and acts on his riders initative (RAW). If the rider engages in combat then he must control the mount accordingly. Note: The above examples assume the mount is of normal animal intelligence or not able to communicate with its rider. In the case of a mount capable of speach, telepathy, etc. It may react differently if it makes a spot check and his rider did not. Conclusion: 1. Having a combat trained mount gives you a more reliable, easier to control and harder to freighten mount. 2. The RAW states that you use your initative for your mount and it acts on your turn. If your mount is surprised or not it uses your initative. 3. Is it worth your time to roll spot checks for combat trained mounts? No. Is it worth your time to roll spot checks for non-combat trained mounts? Yes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can a Mount be Surprised When the Rider is Not?
Top