Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Infiniti2000" data-source="post: 5245058" data-attributes="member: 31734">Negative effects already took their course upon delaying. We agree that you can no longer delay.  However, just as nothing says you can now take your turn, nothing says you lose your turn either.  According to the dazed condition you can still take on action this turn (including free actions).  Simply, the delay ends. Agreed.  Nothing I've said contradicts this. I don't agree.  Taking such an action is NOT using the delay procedure.  It's stopping delaying and taking your action as allowed by the dazed condition.  Contrary to this is that you're inducing a loss of action which is not called out by the dazed condition. This I agree with, but your position has two reasons to disallow readied actions.  The other reason is that you already took an action to ready, so once dazed you can no longer take an action.  For instance, if you could still take immediate actions while dazed, then I would allow you to retain the readied action while you still would not.As another example (A), let's say I readied to move when someone got adjacent to me.  However, that move which interrupts the opponents movement provokes an opportunity attack, which dazes me.  I think you would say I cannot continue my planned movement; I have to stop right there and my turn ends.Actually, I'm not sure if it was covered before, but what if a similar situation (B) arises.  I'm not readying or delaying or anything, but I take a minor and a standard and then I move.  My movement provokes an OA from an unseen opponent and I get dazed.  It's my position that I can finish the movement.  It must therefore be your position that the movement forcibly stops because I've already taken my actions this turn and this movement violates that.</blockquote>

Verification